arXiv AI
AUDITA: certified auditing and causal attribution of adverse outcomes in autonomous multi-agent systems
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Sep 17
Who Audits Whom, on What Substrate, with What Evidence? An Independence-Graded Audit Protocol for Agentic AI
The paper proposes an independence‑graded audit protocol for agentic AI systems, arguing that independence should be evaluated along three orthogonal axes: principal independence, substrate independence, and evidence independence. It introduces a seven‑step protocol based on the beta‑factor model from reliability engineering, demonstrates its application through a structural detectability analysis and a Monte Carlo study, and maps the framework to relevant regulatory standards such as the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42006, and UK public‑sector guidance.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
HANSARD: A Reference Architecture for Forensic Readiness, Runtime Witnessing, and Graded Attribution in Autonomous Multi-Agent AI Systems
arXiv:2608.22512v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous multi-agent systems nowadays act in finance, software supply chains, and security operations. Already, the first largely AI-orchestrated int...
arXiv AI
5d ago
Auditable Claims about AI Agents
The paper "Auditable Claims about AI Agents" argues that for a claim about an AI agent to be verifiable, it must explicitly state the agent’s policy, scope, the records that would confirm the claim, and who is responsible for those records. It extends the Auditable Agents framework by adding conditions of independent record coverage, action‑specific authorization, and completeness beyond integrity, and demonstrates the approach with a claim‑check table applied to six common claims. The authors provide a worked example and practical guidance for operators, buyers, auditors, and standard setters.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 10
The Agent Incident Registry: Toward Preventing Repeated AI Agent Failures
AI agents increasingly act through tools and delegated authority, but general incident repositories rarely capture the mechanisms needed to compare public failures with agent-security evaluations. We...
arXiv AI
Aug 13
Agent Safety Should Be a Runtime Contract
arXiv:2608. 11274v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The dominant paradigm treats AI safety as a property to be instilled during model training via RLHF, DPO, or Constitutional AI.
arXiv AI
Jun 2
POIROT: Interrogating Agents for Failure Detection in Multi-Agent Systems
arXiv:2606. 02282v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Orchestrating Large Language Models into Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-MAS) has unlocked remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet emergent failures and hallucinations that resist characterisation block their deployment in safety-critical domains -- a gap made legally untenable by emerging AI regulation.