arXiv AI By Milos Gravara, Andrija Stanisic, Stefan Nastic

Atlas: Optimizing Deployment of Compound AI Workflows on Heterogeneous Clusters

Read the original on arXiv AI →

Atlas is a framework that optimizes the deployment of compound AI workflows on heterogeneous clusters by selecting execution plans that satisfy service level objectives (SLOs). It introduces MAP, a Markovian Accuracy Predictor, which estimates configuration accuracy using local conditional accuracy transitions between adjacent workflow stages, avoiding exhaustive end‑to‑end profiling. Atlas formulates plan selection as a mixed‑integer linear program, achieving near‑oracle accuracy while reducing deployment cost by up to 42% and profiling cost by up to 2.6×.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 15

PLAIground: SLO-Driven Runtime Model Selection for Compound AI Systems in the Edge-Cloud-Space Continuum

arXiv:2606. 14356v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Applications in the 3D Computing Continuum, which unifies edge, cloud, and space, require combining multiple AI tasks such as object detection, time-series analytics, and natural language processing into Compound AI systems.

By Milos Gravara, Cynthia Marcelino, Andrija Stanisic, Stefan Nastic
arXiv Machine Learning
3d ago

Optimizing AI Inference Across the Deployment Stack

The paper argues that AI deployment performance depends on interactions among compression, compiler transformations, and serving policies rather than just model architecture. It introduces a three‑layer taxonomy—model‑level techniques, compiler transformations, and system policies—and frames deployment as a constrained multi‑objective optimization problem over accuracy, latency, throughput, memory footprint, and energy. The authors propose an evidence protocol for comparable benchmarking and synthesize data from edge and data‑center platforms to show that cross‑layer interactions drive deployment outcomes, concluding with a constraint‑aware selection procedure and open research problems.

By Tejinder Singh, John Pflueger, Jeebak Mitra, Robert Lincourt, Mitchell Markow, Bhavesh A. Patel
arXiv AI
Jun 9

Meeting SLOs, Slashing Hours: Automated Enterprise LLM Optimization with OptiKIT

arXiv:2601. 20408v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Enterprise LLM deployment faces a critical scalability challenge: organizations must optimize models systematically to scale AI initiatives within constrained compute budgets, yet the specialized expertise required for manual optimization remains a niche and scarce skillset.

By Nicholas Santavas, Kareem Eissa, Patrycja Cieplicka, Piotr Florek, Matteo Nulli, Stefan Vasilev, Seyyed Hadi Hashemi, Antonios Gasteratos, Shahram Khadivi