arXiv AI
Oct 31

Can Event Detectors Leave the Broadcast Camera? Evidence from Tennis

The paper introduces a new benchmark of 345 annotated tennis ball bounces and racket hits across eight video clips featuring diverse viewpoints, including broadcast, fixed elevated, phone, and court-level angles. It evaluates several event detection methods—supervised spotters, zero-shot vision-language models, and a parameter-free arbitration layer called RallyArb—showing that supervised models perform well on broadcast footage but poorly on non-broadcast views, while RallyArb maintains high bounce detection across all viewpoints but struggles with precise hit timing. The dataset, evaluation tools, and frozen predictions are publicly released to support further research.

By David Soeiro-Vuong, Andre-Louis Rochet
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 28

Readout and Operating-Point Sensitivity in Event-Stream Candidate Selection

The paper evaluates how readout settings and operating points affect event-stream candidate selection in event-triggered recording. Using 520 DailyDVS‑200 clips and 47 participants, the authors compare several encoder configurations—including DINO‑CLS, patch mean, and MobileNetV3‑Small—across different accumulation durations and view counts, reporting metrics such as target capture, false triggers, and partial AUC. The study finds that lightweight baselines and specific operating points significantly influence performance, while no clear advantage is observed for the JEPA‑specific method.

By Yifan Shuai
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 30

Foresight at the Event Boundary: Evaluating Physical Prediction in Video World Models

The paper introduces an event‑anchored evaluation protocol for video world models, using 62 free‑fall recordings and 124 clips with detailed release and impact annotations. It finds that while some models (Runway, Veo) can generate release and impact events with high accuracy, they often start them late, and others (Cosmos‑Predict‑2.5, MAGI‑1) rarely produce measurable consequences. A human study shows that people’s predictions align with recorded futures but also reveal ambiguity in plausible continuations, highlighting that physical foresight requires initiating, timing, and realizing motion correctly.

By Estela Monserrat Arriaga Santana (National Autonomous University of Mexico), Julian Rosas Scull (National Autonomous University of Mexico), Eh\'ecatl Sacamch'en N\'u\~nez Rico (National Autonomous University of Mexico), Hugo Jair Escalante (University of Texas at El Paso)
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 10

MotionBlind: Probing the Illusion of Motion Understanding in Video-LLMs

arXiv:2609.09528v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Video large language models (Video-LLMs) are increasingly used as the perceptual front end of world models, a role that assumes they can read motion: h...

By Dhairya Bhatia, Bishoy Galoaa, Oliver Fritsche, Shahid Kamal, Muhammad Obaidullah Abdul Salam, Umer Saleem, Om Rastogi, Frania Felix Chettiar, Nesli Erdogmus, Sarah Ostadabbas