The paper introduces a new benchmark of 345 annotated tennis ball bounces and racket hits across eight video clips featuring diverse viewpoints, including broadcast, fixed elevated, phone, and court-level angles. It evaluates several event detection methods—supervised spotters, zero-shot vision-language models, and a parameter-free arbitration layer called RallyArb—showing that supervised models perform well on broadcast footage but poorly on non-broadcast views, while RallyArb maintains high bounce detection across all viewpoints but struggles with precise hit timing. The dataset, evaluation tools, and frozen predictions are publicly released to support further research.
By David Soeiro-Vuong, Andre-Louis Rochet
arXiv:2608. 06361v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-world video benchmarks provide broad coverage, but their fixed clips entangle event count, rate, duration, and visual complexity, making failure modes hard to isolate.
By Sarvesh Baskar, Zikui Cai, Shayan Shabihi, Anirudh Satheesh, Muhammad R. Islam, Udari Madhushani Sehwag, Tom Goldstein, Furong Huang
The paper evaluates how readout settings and operating points affect event-stream candidate selection in event-triggered recording. Using 520 DailyDVS‑200 clips and 47 participants, the authors compare several encoder configurations—including DINO‑CLS, patch mean, and MobileNetV3‑Small—across different accumulation durations and view counts, reporting metrics such as target capture, false triggers, and partial AUC. The study finds that lightweight baselines and specific operating points significantly influence performance, while no clear advantage is observed for the JEPA‑specific method.
By Yifan Shuai
arXiv:2609.15100v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: An image tool can change its underlying generator while retaining its public name, making version attribution from online posts ambiguous. We study t...
By Dennis Ng, Xingyu Shen, Ankit Raj, Kidus Zewde, Tommy Duong, Yuchen Zhou, Yuxin Zhang, Neo Tiangratanakul, Simiao Ren
The paper introduces an event‑anchored evaluation protocol for video world models, using 62 free‑fall recordings and 124 clips with detailed release and impact annotations. It finds that while some models (Runway, Veo) can generate release and impact events with high accuracy, they often start them late, and others (Cosmos‑Predict‑2.5, MAGI‑1) rarely produce measurable consequences. A human study shows that people’s predictions align with recorded futures but also reveal ambiguity in plausible continuations, highlighting that physical foresight requires initiating, timing, and realizing motion correctly.
By Estela Monserrat Arriaga Santana (National Autonomous University of Mexico), Julian Rosas Scull (National Autonomous University of Mexico), Eh\'ecatl Sacamch'en N\'u\~nez Rico (National Autonomous University of Mexico), Hugo Jair Escalante (University of Texas at El Paso)
arXiv:2609.09528v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Video large language models (Video-LLMs) are increasingly used as the perceptual front end of world models, a role that assumes they can read motion: h...
By Dhairya Bhatia, Bishoy Galoaa, Oliver Fritsche, Shahid Kamal, Muhammad Obaidullah Abdul Salam, Umer Saleem, Om Rastogi, Frania Felix Chettiar, Nesli Erdogmus, Sarah Ostadabbas