arXiv Machine Learning
Apriel-Reasoner: RL Post-Training for General-Purpose and Efficient Reasoning
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 17
Leveraging Instruction Tuning and Merging for Reasoning Model Adaptation
arXiv:2607. 14895v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reasoning language models (RLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in domains such as mathematics and coding.
arXiv AI
Jun 9
Correct Is Not Enough: Training Reasoning Planners with Executor-Grounded Rewards
arXiv:2605. 03862v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has become a common way to improve explicit reasoning in large language models, but final-answer correctness alone does not reveal whether the reasoning trace is faithful, reliable, or useful to the model that consumes it.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
Is Next-Chunk Reasoning RL Really Better than SFT? Revisiting Training Strategies under no-CoT Data
arXiv:2608.23256v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work proposes next-chunk reasoning RL for leveraging no-CoT data---corpora such as worked solutions and textbook derivations that contain reason...
arXiv AI
Jul 2
Predicting LLM Reasoning Performance with Small Proxy Model
arXiv:2509. 21013v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Given the prohibitive cost of pre-training large language models, it is essential to leverage smaller proxy models to optimize datasets before scaling up.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28
Learning to Reason with Curriculum I: Provable Benefits of Autocurriculum
The paper investigates whether the high costs of training chain-of-thought reasoning models can be reduced through algorithmic design. It introduces an autocurriculum approach that lets the model select which problems to focus on during training, showing that this method provably improves both supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning. For supervised fine‑tuning, autocurriculum requires exponentially fewer reasoning demonstrations by targeting prompts where the model struggles, while for reinforcement learning it decouples computational cost from the quality of the reference model, making the burn‑in cost nearly independent of target accuracy.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 17
Continual Self-Improvement with Lightweight Experiential Latent Memories
arXiv:2606. 17803v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models achieve strong reasoning performance by scaling inference-time compute, yet remain fundamentally stateless, discarding the rich, self-produced reasoning traces generated during this process.