arXiv AI By Abhash Kumar Jha, Diana Alexandra Onu\c{t}u, Neeratyoy Mallik, Swagatam Haldar, Sam Laing, Niccol\`o Ajroldi, Shiwei Liu, Joaquin Vanschoren, Aaron Klein

Amortizing Scaling Law Construction Costs

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper proposes a framework to reduce the cost of constructing scaling laws for large foundation models by treating data collection as a Bayesian optimization problem. It shows that expanding the compute budget progressively and augmenting observed configurations with surrogate-fantasized evaluations can recover a broad experimental grid, enabling accurate scaling law fitting without training every configuration. This approach can achieve computational savings of up to 10–100× compared to a full dense grid.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 2

Efficiently Estimating Optimal Hyperparameter Scaling Laws through Power-Law Entropy Search

The paper introduces Power‑Law Entropy Search (PLES), a computational‑cost‑aware acquisition function that uses multi‑fidelity Bayesian optimization to efficiently estimate optimal hyperparameter scaling laws for large language model training. PLES focuses on reducing the overall uncertainty of scaling law estimates rather than optimizing a single objective, selecting configurations that maximize uncertainty reduction per unit computational cost. Experiments on synthetic benchmarks, surrogate models, and real LLM pre‑training runs show that PLES converges to accurate scaling laws using less than one‑tenth of the computational budget required by conventional grid search and other baselines.

By Zhiliang Chen, Sebastian Ament, David Eriksson, Maximilian Balandat, Eytan Bakshy, Jihao Andreas Lin
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Practical Scaling Laws: Converting Compute into Performance in a Data-Constrained World

The paper introduces a new closed‑form scaling law that extends Chinchilla’s original formula to handle data‑constrained regimes. It decomposes loss into undercapacity, undertraining, and overfitting components, saturating between an irreducible loss and an uninformed baseline. The authors validate the model on diverse architectures and domains, achieving state‑of‑the‑art RMSE across multiple LLM scaling‑law grids and enabling cost‑aware training allocations.

By Christopher M. Bryant, Hao Liu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 12

Small-Scale Experiments: Are We There Yet?

Scaling laws promised cost-effective experiments; six years later, they have yet to fully deliver. Instead, researchers have found them unreliable at small scales (starting at 4M parameters) and concluded that sizable models cannot be avoided.