arXiv Machine Learning By Sijie Li, Shanda Li, Haowei Lin, Weiwei Sun, Ameet Talwalkar, Yiming Yang

Spend Less, Fit Better: Budget-Efficient Scaling Law Fitting via Active Experiment Selection

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2604. 22753v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scaling laws are used to plan multi-million-dollar training runs, but fitting those laws can itself cost millions.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Sep 7

Amortizing Scaling Law Construction Costs

The paper proposes a framework to reduce the cost of constructing scaling laws for large foundation models by treating data collection as a Bayesian optimization problem. It shows that expanding the compute budget progressively and augmenting observed configurations with surrogate-fantasized evaluations can recover a broad experimental grid, enabling accurate scaling law fitting without training every configuration. This approach can achieve computational savings of up to 10–100× compared to a full dense grid.

By Abhash Kumar Jha, Diana Alexandra Onu\c{t}u, Neeratyoy Mallik, Swagatam Haldar, Sam Laing, Niccol\`o Ajroldi, Shiwei Liu, Joaquin Vanschoren, Aaron Klein
arXiv AI
Sep 2

Efficiently Estimating Optimal Hyperparameter Scaling Laws through Power-Law Entropy Search

The paper introduces Power‑Law Entropy Search (PLES), a computational‑cost‑aware acquisition function that uses multi‑fidelity Bayesian optimization to efficiently estimate optimal hyperparameter scaling laws for large language model training. PLES focuses on reducing the overall uncertainty of scaling law estimates rather than optimizing a single objective, selecting configurations that maximize uncertainty reduction per unit computational cost. Experiments on synthetic benchmarks, surrogate models, and real LLM pre‑training runs show that PLES converges to accurate scaling laws using less than one‑tenth of the computational budget required by conventional grid search and other baselines.

By Zhiliang Chen, Sebastian Ament, David Eriksson, Maximilian Balandat, Eytan Bakshy, Jihao Andreas Lin
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Are Coreset Selection Methods Worth Their Cost?

The paper evaluates coreset selection methods by incorporating both selection and training time into a unified wall‑clock budget, using a standardized benchmark across four datasets and multiple selectors. Across numerous budget anchors, simple random or full‑data training consistently outperforms sophisticated selectors, and selection costs are dominated by a full‑dataset scan that cannot be amortized. The study also identifies when subset reuse can justify selection and reports several correctness fixes in a popular codebase.

By Yangze Liu, Zhongyi Han