arXiv Machine Learning
ALPHABET: A Laplace-Pole History Aggregator with Banked Exponential Transport
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 25
ALPHABET: A Laplace-Pole History Aggregator with Banked Exponential Transport
Can a sequence model remain competitive with only a few thousand parameters and an explicitly auditable prediction interface? We introduce ALPHABET, a compact linear-time model that compresses tempora...
arXiv Statistics ML
2d ago
Extending SSMs with the Exponentially Weighted Signature
arXiv:2603.19198v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce the exponentially weighted signature (EWS), a continuous-time model that computes iterated integrals of a path, where each increment i...
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4
The Label Defines the Timescale: Trait-State Limits of Temporal-Aggregate Learning
arXiv:2608. 01587v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine-learning benchmarks often pair a label that aggregates a long temporal horizon with input observed through one or a few short windows.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9
FRWKV+: Periodic-Aware Adaptive Gating for Frequency-Space Linear Time Series Forecasting
arXiv:2605. 15690v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Accurate and efficient long-term multivariate time series forecasting requires capturing recurring temporal structure while keeping inference cheap across many variables and horizons.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
AsyTO: Asymmetric Temporal Operator for Parameter-Efficient Multivariate Time Series Forecasting
arXiv:2608. 16098v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multivariate time-series forecasting faces a structural dilemma: sharing one temporal predictor across variables is parameter-efficient but forces heterogeneous variables through an identical history-to-future map, whereas learning an independent predictor per variable restores flexibility at a cost that grows with the product of variable count, context length, and horizon.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 17
When Dynamics Models Read the Wrong Time Steps: Label-Free Event Credit Re-Anchoring for Robust Global Readouts
arXiv:2606. 17572v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learned dynamics models often answer global physical questions, such as fault severity or impact stiffness, by pooling a per-step feature sequence into one readout vector.