arXiv AI By Juan Zambrano, Cl\'ement Contet, Jairo Gudi\~no-Rosero, Felipe Garrido-Lucero, Umberto Grandi, C\'esar Hidalgo

Algorithmic Shortlisting in Participatory Budgeting

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2508. 06577v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Participatory budgeting is a democratic innovation that allows citizens to propose and vote on public investment projects.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 4

Toward Collective-Centric Evaluation of Preference Inference for Participatory Democracy

The paper examines how Preference Inference (PI) models used in large-scale participatory democracy platforms can alter the perceived consensus and minority support by predicting missing votes. It introduces a collective‑centric evaluation framework that assesses whether inferred votes maintain key properties of the overall preference landscape, rather than focusing solely on individual prediction accuracy. Using the largest multilingual dataset to date—four consultations with over 90,000 participants, 1 million votes, and 22 languages—the study finds that models with similar predictive accuracy can differ markedly in how well they preserve the collective structure, underscoring that accuracy alone is insufficient for evaluating PI in democratic contexts.

By Pierre-Antoine Lequeu, Salim Hafid, Paul Lerner, Nazanin Shafiabadi, Laur\`ene Cave, David Mas, Jean-Philippe Cointet, Benjamin Piwowarski, Fran\c{c}ois Yvon
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Calpric: Inclusive and Fine-grain Labeling of Privacy Policies with Crowdsourcing and Active Learning

Calpric is a system that combines automatic text selection, segmentation, active learning, and crowdsourced annotation to create a large, balanced training set for privacy policy classification. By simplifying the labeling task, it enables untrained crowd workers to match the performance of trained annotators and reduces inter‑annotator disagreement, cutting labeling costs. The approach yields a dataset of 16,000 policy text segments across nine data categories and produces models that deliver accurate, fine‑grained labels at a cost of roughly $0.92–$1.71 per segment.

By Wenjun Qiu, David Lie, Lisa Austin