← Back to all news
arXiv Machine Learning September 1, 2026 By Shicheng Hu, Runzhi Tian, Ziqiao Wang, Yongyi Mao

On the Recoverability of Private Information Unlearning in Large Language Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.

  • llms
  • safety

One email a morning, machine-written

One email a day, machine-written, one click to leave. We never share your address.

Related stories

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 15

Auditing Machine Unlearning: A Systematic Research on Whether Models Truly Forget

Machine unlearning has been extensively studied in response to growing privacy concerns and regulatory requirements. However, auditing whether unlearning algorithms have truly erased the influence of specific data remains an open challenge.

llmsfine-tuningsafety
More like this →
arXiv AI
Jul 22

Phantoms and Disclosures: A Statistical Framework for Auditing Privacy in Synthetic Data

arXiv:2606. 16952v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred interest in synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative to sensitive real-world datasets.

By Kareem Amin, Rudrajit Das, Alessandro Epasto, Adel Javanmard, Dennis Kraft, M\'onica Ribero, Sergei Vassilvitskii
llmssafety
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Unlearning Isn't Invisible: Detecting Unlearning Traces in LLMs from Model Outputs

arXiv:2506. 14003v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine unlearning (MU) for large language models (LLMs), commonly referred to as LLM unlearning, seeks to remove specific undesirable data or knowledge from a trained model, while maintaining its performance on standard tasks.

By Yiwei Chen, Soumyadeep Pal, Yimeng Zhang, Qing Qu, Sijia Liu
llmssafety
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 16

Auditing Machine Unlearning: A Systematic Research on Whether Models Truly Forget

arXiv:2606. 16110v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine unlearning has been extensively studied in response to growing privacy concerns and regulatory requirements.

By Dayong Ye, Tianqing Zhu, Ruiding Huang, Xinbo Fu, Jiayang Li, Bo Liu, Huan Huo, Wanlei Zhou
llmsfine-tuningsafety
More like this →
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Phantoms and Disclosures: a Causal Framework for Auditing Synthetic Data

arXiv:2606. 16952v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred interest in synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative to sensitive real-world datasets.

By Kareem Amin, Rudrajit Das, Alessandro Epasto, Adel Javanmard, Dennis Kraft, M\'onica Ribero, Sergei Vassilvitskii
llmssafety
More like this →
arXiv AI
Jun 10

Advancing the State-of-the-Art in Empirical Privacy Auditing

arXiv:2606. 10481v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) can exhibit problematic memorization of individual training examples.

By Nicole Mitchell, Galen Andrew, Arun Ganesh, Brendan McMahan, Peter Kairouz
llmsfine-tuningbenchmarkssafety
More like this →
About Pricing API Newsletter Sources Privacy Terms Refunds Accessibility Provider info Contact RSS

The Flow links to publishers and never republishes their articles. Summaries are machine-generated.

v1.1.0 · 5f852ea