arXiv AI
AI Teaches Humans to Handle Complexity in the Game of Go
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 21
AI sustains higher strategic tension than humans in chess
arXiv:2508. 13213v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Strategic decision-making requires balancing immediate opportunities against long-term objectives: a tension fundamental to competitive environments.
arXiv AI
Jul 2
Play Like Champions: Counterfactual Feedback Generation in Latent Space
arXiv:2607. 00190v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in reinforcement learning have produced superhuman agents across a wide range of competitive games.
arXiv AI
Jul 14
People use fast and flat simulation to reason about new games
arXiv:2510. 11503v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Games have long been a microcosm for studying planning and reasoning in both natural and artificial intelligence (AI), often focusing on expert-level or even super-human play.
arXiv AI
Jun 19
Superhuman Safe and Agile Racing through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2605. 22748v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Autonomous systems have achieved superhuman performance in isolation or simulation, yet they remain brittle in shared, dynamic real-world spaces.
arXiv AI
Sep 17
What Counts as Strategic Reasoning? A Systematic Mapping of Chess Research on Humans, Engines, and Language Models
The paper presents a systematic mapping of recent chess research involving humans, engines, neural and reinforcement‑learning systems, large language models (LLMs), and hybrid approaches. It identifies 84 core study families and classifies them by agent type, strategic‑reasoning stages, and evaluation dimensions, highlighting a strong focus on situation assessment, evaluation, and action selection while noting gaps in planning, explanation, metacognition, and human–AI collaboration. The study also distinguishes hybrid systems by integration timing and cautions that improved human performance in evaluations does not automatically imply human–AI synergy.
arXiv AI
Oct 7
SpeedrunBench: Challenging LLM Agents with Video Game Speedrunning
SpeedrunBench is a new benchmark that tests large language model agents on their ability to develop and refine strategies for completing nine different video games as quickly as possible. The benchmark requires agents to repeatedly improve, reflect, and reason over long action horizons to beat both themselves and other players. Experiments show that while agents can approach human records on simple platformers, they lag behind humans on longer, more complex games within realistic resource limits.