arXiv AI
Agentic Security: A Systematization of Tools, Failure Modes, and Design Laws for LLM-Driven Penetration Testing
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 7
Determinants and Limits of LLM Security-Tool Orchestration: A Study with HexStrike-AI
arXiv:2607. 02873v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model agents driving security tool suites over the Model Context Protocol are increasingly common.
arXiv AI
Jul 21
STAC: When Innocent Tools Form Dangerous Chains for LLM Agents
arXiv:2509. 25624v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As LLMs advance into autonomous agents with tool-use capabilities, they introduce security challenges that extend beyond traditional content-based LLM safety concerns.
arXiv AI
Jul 3
A Unified Framework for the Evaluation of LLM Agentic Capabilities
arXiv:2605. 27898v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As LLMs are increasingly deployed as agents, reliable assessment of their agentic capabilities has become essential.
arXiv AI
Jul 3
Safety Testing LLM Agents at Scale: From Risk Discovery to Evidence-Grounded Verification
arXiv:2607. 01793v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly perform autonomous actions through external tools, leading to complex and evolving safety risks.
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Mission-Level Runtime Assurance for LLM-Assisted ISR Swarms over a Verification-Aware Fabric
arXiv:2607. 23532v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Swarms of LLM-assisted autonomous robots are increasingly proposed for cooperative intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) in contested environments.
arXiv AI
Aug 3
Tool Specifications Matter: Uncovering and Mitigating Safety Risks in AI Agents
arXiv:2607. 29254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents extend large language models (LLMs) with external tools, enabling them to perform complex tasks and translate model outputs into consequential real-world actions.