Graphical user interface (GUI) agents now execute workflows across real applications, but when execution drifts, users must determine what changed, what should have remained untouched, and what can st...
arXiv:2605. 10555v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As AI agents transition from research prototypes to enterprise production systems, the tool interfaces they consume remain rooted in human-oriented CRUD paradigms.
By Kai Pan, Rong Hou
arXiv:2607. 17225v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic AI systems do not just predict or recommend; they plan, maintain state, and act in external environments with varying degrees of autonomy.
By Chetan Arora, Andreas Vogelsang, Abbi Sharma
arXiv:2606. 01508v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Traditional operating systems were designed around deterministic programs, explicit control flow, and human initiated workflows.
By Ankur Sharma, Deep Shah
The paper investigates how large language model agents handle long‑horizon tasks and finds that verification is crucial for success but often occurs too late. It shows that sharing a common context dilutes duty‑relevant information and that simply separating duties among agents is insufficient, as agents can lose sight of the overall goal. To address these issues, the authors propose Goal‑Aware Dynamic Multi‑Agent Collaboration (GAD), which uses an execution graph to organize subtasks, keeps each agent’s context focused on its specific goal, and dynamically adjusts task dependencies and information sharing based on execution evidence, with verification and recovery checks providing feedback for repair.
The paper introduces Goal-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Collaboration (GAD), a framework that assigns distinct duties to separate agents with individualized contexts to tackle long-horizon tasks. It employs a growing execution graph to structure subtasks and their dependencies, ensuring each agent retains the original instruction, task goal, and acceptance conditions. GAD dynamically adapts collaboration and information sharing, using verification and recovery checks to monitor subtask results and overall task completion, providing feedback for repair when checks fail.
By Xu Shen, Lingyong Yan, Shuaiqiang Wang, Jianmin Wu, Zhikai Chen, Jiliang Tang, Jie Ren