arXiv:2606. 11676v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Traditional wildfire models rely on rigid, low-dimensional parameters and static fuel maps, frequently underpredicting fire spread.
By Maksym Zhenirovskyy, Ion Matei, Rohit Vuppala, Takuya Kurihana, Hon Yung Wonga
arXiv:2609.17763v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Next-day wildfire prediction requires models whose forecasts can be evaluated alongside the assumptions and historical evidence used in their computati...
By Miguel Esparza, Aydin Ayanzadeh Ahmad Mousavi, Ali Mostafavi
The study evaluates deep learning surrogates for wildfire spread prediction, training four architectures on 10,584 high‑resolution simulations from Catalonia. Results show that only surface fuel load significantly predicts burn probability, and convolutional models mainly use distance to the fire front while a transformer model emphasizes fuel and terrain. When applied to a new region without retraining, the models still perform reasonably, with only a modest accuracy drop.
By Marcin Lawenda, Aleksandra Krasicka, David Caballero, Luis Torres, {\L}ukasz Szustak
arXiv:2607. 07951v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Wildfire smoke events produce extreme PM$_{2.
By Yongcan Huang, Li Jiang, Ze Yu Liu
arXiv:2509. 25017v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Wildfires are among the most severe natural hazards, posing a significant threat to both humans and natural ecosystems.
By Spyros Kondylatos, Nikolas Papadopoulos, Gustau Camps-Valls, Ioannis Papoutsis
The paper investigates how to allocate wildfire suppression resources over time on a graph-based landscape model. It proves the problem and two variants are strongly NP-complete on planar graphs and weighted directed grids, and remains hard even when all resources are released simultaneously. The authors introduce a new mixed-integer programming formulation that outperforms previous methods, and present a physics‑grounded instance generator based on Rothermel's model to benchmark algorithms on realistic scenarios.
By Gustavo Delazeri, Marcus Ritt