arXiv Computer Vision
Accuracy and efficiency of compact foundation models for surface-water mapping during floods
Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computer Vision.
Related stories
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 26
Accuracy and efficiency of compact foundation models for surface-water mapping during floods
Pretrained Earth observation models may reduce the effort needed to map surface water, but their value depends on the alternative against which they are compared. We evaluated Prithvi-EO-2.0-Tiny usin...
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 1
A Controlled Evaluation of Model Rankings and Input Reliance in Surface Water Segmentation
arXiv:2608.30895v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Performance evaluation for surface-water segmentation commonly uses an aggregate metric such as global intersection-over-union (IoU) to rank model conf...
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 31
A Controlled Evaluation of Model Rankings and Input Reliance in Surface Water Segmentation
Performance evaluation for surface-water segmentation commonly uses an aggregate metric such as global intersection-over-union (IoU) to rank model configurations. However, a configuration ranking does...
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18
Cross-Architecture Foundation-Model Distillation for Edge Flood Segmentation
The paper presents a method for distilling a large 300‑million‑parameter geospatial foundation model (Prithvi‑EO‑2.0) into a compact 0.7‑million‑parameter EfficientViT‑B0 student for flood segmentation. By using the teacher to supervise additional unlabeled Sentinel‑2 imagery, the student’s training set expands without new manual labels, achieving competitive performance on Sen1Floods11 and STURM‑Flood while remaining smaller and faster. After quantization, the student runs as a 1.5‑MB INT8 TensorRT engine on a Jetson Xavier NX, processing 512×512 images in 5.57 ms with ~14 MB of memory.
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 1
Cryo-Bench: Benchmarking Foundation Models for Cryosphere Mapping
Cryo-Bench is a new benchmark that evaluates foundation models for cryosphere mapping, comprising six semantic‑segmentation datasets across five cryospheric components (supraglacial debris, glacial lakes, sea ice, calving fronts, and Antarctic ice‑shelf extent). The benchmark includes multispectral, RGB, and SAR observations from under‑represented regions and tests thirteen geo‑foundation models alongside U‑Net and Vision Transformer baselines. Results show that with frozen encoders U‑Net slightly outperforms TerraMind, but the difference is not statistically significant; fine‑tuning with learning‑rate optimization can dramatically improve performance for some models, while in few‑shot scenarios several foundation models retain over 90 % of their full‑label accuracy.
arXiv AI
Sep 23
Hapi: A Multivariable Land-Surface Transformer for Medium-Range Hydrological Forecasting at Continental Scale
arXiv:2609.22702v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate flood forecasts several days in advance are essential for flood control, water-resource management, and emergency response. Producing them at...