arXiv AI By Xiulin Yang, Arianna Bisazza, Nathan Schneider, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox

A Unified Assessment of the Poverty of the Stimulus Argument for Neural Language Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2602. 09992v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Several recent contributions have evaluated the Poverty of the Stimulus Hypothesis (PoSH) using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs).

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
3d ago

Synthetic Pre-pretraining Survives Scale, but Not as a Grammatical Prior

The study evaluates synthetic pre‑pretraining (PPT) across a wide range of models (500 M–7 B parameters) and training budgets (up to 100 B tokens). Results show that PPT consistently improves downstream performance and token efficiency, saving at least 21 B tokens at the 3 B scale, but these gains do not appear to stem from a grammatical prior. Instead, PPT benefits arise from tasks that enhance long‑range retrieval, and the improvements remain robust across diverse data mixtures, diminishing only when web text is omitted.

By Atsuki Yamaguchi, Tatsuro Inaba, Joel Niklaus, Michal \v{S}tef\'anik, Aline Villavicencio, Nikolaos Aletras
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

Disentangling Statistical Preemption from Entrenchment in Language Models' Avoidance of Overgeneralization

The paper investigates how language models avoid overgeneralizations by distinguishing between two types of indirect negative evidence: preemption and entrenchment. Through controlled rearing experiments on models trained on child‑caregiver conversations, the authors find that models do not exhibit verb‑specific preemption but show weak abstract preemption. Analysis of training dynamics suggests that competing structures act as indirect positive evidence rather than negative in the verb‑specific condition.

By Yixuan Wang, Freda Shi, Kanishka Misra