arXiv Computation and Language By Mohammed Damom, Muneef Y. Alshawsh, Ashraf A. Naji, Mustafa Ali Alhamzi, Fawwaz An-Nashef, Jameel Ahmed Elayah, Mohammed Q. Shormani, Noman AL-Sayadi

A generative-informed neuro-symbolic framework for syntactic ambiguity resolution: Evidence from Arabic DPs

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces a generative‑informed neuro‑symbolic framework that combines generative syntactic theory with AraBERT to resolve structural ambiguity in Modern Standard Arabic noun phrases. By treating ambiguity as a candidate‑based decision task, the model explicitly constructs and evaluates linguistically motivated alternatives, achieving high accuracy (96.88%) and strong F1 scores on an unseen evaluation set. Analysis shows uneven performance across attachment types, with near‑perfect recall for high/VP attachment but lower recall for low/NP/embedded attachment, highlighting challenges in recovering embedded interpretations.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Why Current XAI Is Not Enough for Arabic NLP: A Critical Survey of the Explainability Gap

The paper surveys the state of Explainable AI (XAI) in Arabic NLP, highlighting three gaps: a method gap where Arabic XAI relies mainly on limited post‑hoc techniques; a task gap with most work focused on classification tasks and little on generation, retrieval, or dialogue; and a linguistic gap where explanations rarely address Arabic‑specific phenomena such as morphology, dialects, and diglossia. It proposes a taxonomy of tasks, methods, linguistic units, and evaluation practices, and outlines a research agenda for linguistically grounded Arabic XAI.

By Salima Lamsiyah, Ruslan Mitkov
arXiv AI
Sep 1

Beyond Fluency: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating Saudi Dialect and Cultural Competence in Large Language Models

The paper introduces a rubric-based benchmark to evaluate Saudi Arabic dialect and cultural competence in large language models. It comprises 31 expert-authored prompts covering idiomatic, pragmatic, lexical, and culturally embedded aspects, each paired with an expert-established ground truth. Four state-of-the-art models were scored, revealing that none exceeded 55% accuracy and that ambiguous framing was the most common error type.

By Ghassan Al-Sumaidaee, Sajjad Abdoli, Ahmed Rashad, Maxim Legg
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22

AlexandriaX 2026: The First Shared Task on Dialectal Arabic Machine Translation

arXiv:2609.22796v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dialectal Arabic machine translation (MT) remains challenging despite recent progress in Arabic language technologies, particularly because effective t...

By Abdellah El Mekki, AbdelRahim A. Elmadany, Samar M. Magdy, Saad Ezzini, Mo El-Haj, Mustafa Jarrar, Zaid Alyafeai, Bernard Ghanem, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 21

QuranicMMLU: A Cognitively-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Generative AI Solutions on Quranic Linguistic Knowledge

arXiv:2609.22038v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce QuranicMMLU, a benchmark for evaluating generative AI on Quranic Arabic across multiple dimensions of linguistic complexity. Existing Qura...

By Rawan El Ghali, Umm Kulsoom, Anas Madkoor, Dima Faris Alsaudi, Roaa Abdelmagid, Roaa Ibrahim, Raghad Mousa, Hamza Aljaji, Abdullah Khanafer, Abdallah Alkanani, Salah Feras Alali, Rawan Khaled Mohamed, Ehsaneddin Asgari