The paper investigates in-context binding errors in language models, showing that a linear probe can recover correct entity bindings from frozen hidden states even when the model outputs incorrect bindings. Across 16 checkpoints, the probe’s accuracy on failure cases surpasses a baseline by about 0.196, and a probe‑based score improves failure detection over the model’s confidence by 0.079 AUROC. Steering the residual stream toward the probe‑decoded binding further boosts accuracy by an average of 0.168 across eight models.
By Manas Venkata Sai Ravulapalli, Samrath Singh Chadha, Abhinav M. Hari
arXiv:2609.08618v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Benchmark scores describe what a checkpoint can do now, but they do not determine how it will respond to the next training episode. We measure this mis...
By Zhongxuan Liu, Sicheng Zhou, Hongzhi Wang
The paper introduces the concept of intervention fidelity in latent world models, measuring whether a model’s open‑loop transitions align with actual environment interventions. Experiments on TD‑MPC2, Cheetah, and DreamerV3 show that high reward fit does not guarantee fidelity, and that self‑supervised models can outperform task‑anchored ones in preserving intervention effects. The authors propose a capture‑gated audit to localize failures and argue that fidelity must be directly audited on the model’s native interface.
By Donna Vakalis
arXiv:2609.36569v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Checkpoint selection is a routine decision in supervised fine-tuning (SFT): training produces multiple checkpoints, but only one is retained. Yet fix...
By Yupeng Chang, Wenxuan Zhang, Yuan Wu
arXiv:2607. 20436v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safety evaluations often assume that behavior observed during testing reflects behavior in ordinary use, but fine-tuning can break this assumption.
By Phongsakon Mark Konrad, Toygar Tanyel, Serkan Ayvaz
arXiv:2609.01048v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Across the full Pythia suite (160M-12B, eight checkpoints, four task families), a linear probe can read a target variable from the residual stream as...
By Xining Xun
The paper introduces a diagnostic framework for long‑horizon security LLM agents that uses checkpoints to distinguish failures occurring before and after a model’s capability is exposed, and applies controlled interventions to pinpoint upstream bottlenecks. The methodology is tested on four task families—delayed reuse of discovered information, reuse of observed state, recovery from failed strategies, and decision making after uncertain outcomes—revealing that many failures happen before the agent observes the state it later needs to reuse. Experiments with Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemini 3.7 Flash show that targeted protocol‑disambiguation guidance can significantly alter state observation rates and that the primary source of failure can shift across model generations, underscoring the need for fine‑grained failure diagnostics rather than relying solely on overall task success.
By Wei Shao, Chongzhou Fang, Zuxiong Tan, Zequan Liang, Setareh Rafatirad, Avesta Sasan, Houman Homayoun
arXiv:2605. 12705v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: How can we train models whose post-trained capabilities survive subsequent fine-tuning?
By Lawrence Feng, Gaurav R. Ghosal, Jacob Mitchell Springer, Ziqian Zhong, Aditi Raghunathan
arXiv:2608. 20290v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Whether a language model has improved itself is increasingly judged not by mean accuracy but by which individual problems it gains and loses.
By Cheng Xu, Nan Yan, Liming Chen, M-Tahar Kechadi
arXiv:2609.08966v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Language-model checkpoints are commonly selected by pretraining loss or benchmark scores, assuming that the highest-scoring checkpoint will remain the...
By Sohir Maskey, Philipp Scholl, Jonas Knupp, Pit Neitemeier, Sascha Wirges
arXiv:2607. 26929v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The same diagnostic result can support or challenge one causal claim yet fail to address another when the claims concern different populations, outcomes, estimands, pathways, or identifying assumptions.
By Weiyi Kong, Zhuoran Li
arXiv:2606. 05145v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When post-trained language models fail on reasoning problems, the common test-time-scaling response is to spend more compute on additional attempts, and the failed traces play no further role.
By Nizar Islah, Istabrak Abbes, Irina Rish, Sarath Chandar, Eilif B. Muller