arXiv:2608.28593v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the increasing development of AI regulatory frameworks, ensuring that artificial intelligence systems, particularly generative models, operate in...
arXiv:2606. 00621v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence has fundamentally changed how content is now produced.
arXiv:2606. 12415v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid global expansion of artificial intelligence regulation has generated, across multiple jurisdictions, a demand for legal expertise dedicated to AI that the market has addressed in a fragmented manner.
arXiv:2606. 31250v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLM) trained on web-scale corpora generate output that may infringe copyright, yet existing technical safeguards focus narrowly on verbatim memorisation.
arXiv:2605.24842v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This paper examines how the labour of translators has been transformed into foundational data capital for the age of artificial intelligence (AI)....
The paper discusses the "authorship hazard" in agentic dataspaces, where AI agents can draft and publish governance artifacts without human approval. It argues that agents should be treated as subjects of governance, not authors, and proposes mechanisms to enforce this, such as closing the authorization channel and treating drafting as an enforcement problem. Experiments show that unapproved agent drafts can reverse many authorization decisions, highlighting the need for robust review processes.
The paper argues that federated learning, while touted as privacy‑preserving, still concentrates control over the resulting model with the entity that orchestrates training. It identifies three layers—storage, circulation, and learning—where creative communities can exert governance, noting that current practices allow consent for training but not for model ownership or federation. The authors propose four design principles for a creative data commons that extends governance to models, ensures legibility of terms at contribution, incorporates refusal as a first‑class state, and makes stewardship transparent and accountable.
arXiv:2607. 05479v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) systems store and process client data in three distinct ways: in the model's parameters through training and memorisation, in the context window during a live session, and in knowledge databases for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
arXiv:2608. 02699v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When algorithms make or influence consequential decisions---about loan eligibility, hiring, or healthcare---EU law grants affected individuals a Right to Explanation.
arXiv:2610.33605v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This book develops a unified governance framework for systems that retrieve, generate, infer, remember and act on information from large language model...
The article discusses the evolution of AI across three generations—from explicit logic to neural networks to large language models (LLMs)—and how LLMs introduce new systemic risks. It applies a forensic‑psychology profiling method to identify ten key features of LLMs, such as hallucinations, bias, and cognitive atrophy, revealing an entity that confabulates, amplifies user biases, and erodes human competence. The report concludes with a four‑pillar framework for AI resilience, emphasizing cognitive sovereignty, measurable control, partial autonomy, and openness to safeguard society.
arXiv:2506. 03218v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The EU has become one of the vanguards in regulating the digital age.