Entity Matching using Decision Models explores a new class of large language model (LLM) approaches that output probabilities for predefined answer options instead of generating text. The study evaluates six decision models in a zero‑shot setting across eight benchmarks, comparing them to the generative LLM GPT‑6 Luna and the PLM‑based matcher Ditto. Results show that the top four decision models achieve mean F1 scores comparable to or slightly better than GPT‑6 Luna, outperform Ditto on most benchmarks, run faster and are cheaper, and can be further improved by a cascade that delegates uncertain pairs to an ensemble of generative LLMs.
By Aaron Steiner, Ralph Peeters, Christian Bizer
The paper investigates three fusion paradigms—Merge, Mix RL, and multi‑teacher on‑policy distillation (MOPD)—for consolidating reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) across multiple domains. Experiments across model scales and a multi‑domain benchmark show that while overall performance differences are small, significant gaps can appear on specific tasks, and each method exhibits distinct training dynamics and constraints. Practical guidelines are offered: Merge for cheap fusion when experts exist, Mix RL for unified training with adjustable domain mixtures, and MOPD when preserving domain‑specific gains is paramount.
By Siye Wu, Kai Yang, Yuchen Cai, Xin Xu, Peng-Yuan Wang, Jiaxuan Wang, Jiashun Liu, Jiafei Lyu, Yangkun Chen, Saiyong Yang, Yanghua Xiao
DE‑Venus is a unified, data‑efficient framework for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) tailored to large language models. It structures the RLVR lifecycle into three modules—Active Data Selection, Weak Supervision Construction, and Training‑Time Supervision Refinement—allowing method‑specific decisions to be expressed as dataset transitions or online transformations while maintaining distributed execution contracts. Experiments on public benchmarks and three business scenarios show that DE‑Venus can preserve or improve model quality using only 10% of labels or 13% of relevant data, and can cut convergence steps by 63%–75% in selected business configurations.
By Shenzhi Yang, Guangcheng Zhu, Kai Tang, Zhengqing Zang, Xing Zheng, Haobo Wang, Yingfan Ma, Bowen Song, Bo Han, Bo An, Lei Feng, Weiqiang Wang, Junbo Zhao, Gang Chen
arXiv:2510. 08233v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) are promising alternatives to autoregressive large language models (AR-LLMs), as they potentially allow higher inference throughput.
By Yuchen Zhu, Wei Guo, Jaemoo Choi, Petr Molodyk, Bo Yuan, Molei Tao, Yongxin Chen
The paper introduces CE‑RAG4EM, a cost‑efficient framework that applies retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) to entity matching (EM) by using blocking‑based batch retrieval and generation. It demonstrates that, in a zero‑shot setting, CE‑RAG4EM achieves comparable or better matching quality than naive RAG while significantly reducing end‑to‑end overhead. Experiments on nine real‑world EM benchmarks show that the approach closes the knowledge grounding gap for LLM‑based EM, especially on datasets with ambiguous or sparse attributes, and provides clear guidance on balancing accuracy and computational cost through blocking size and retrieval granularity.
By Chuangtao Ma, Zeyu Zhang, Arijit Khan, Sebastian Schelter, Paul Groth
The paper introduces POISE, a reinforcement learning algorithm that uses a model’s internal states as a value estimator to reduce variance in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). By employing a lightweight probe that reads internal signals during the forward pass, POISE predicts baselines online and uses a cross‑rollout construction to keep gradients unbiased. Experiments on Qwen3‑4B and OLMo3‑7B‑Instruct‑DPO across six domains show POISE outperforms existing RLVR baselines, offering more stable training and a value model that generalizes across tasks and scales with the policy.
By Yunho Choi, Jongwon Lim, Woojin Ahn, Minjae Oh, Jeonghoon Shim, Yohan Jo
arXiv:2508. 06165v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities through two complementary paradigms: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for knowledge grounding and Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) for complex reasoning.
By Weitao Li, Boran Xiang, Xiaolong Wang, Zhinan Gou, Weizhi Ma, Yang Liu
arXiv:2607. 24688v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Entity matching identifies records that refer to the same real-world entity.
By Zeyu Zhang, Xue Li, Iacer Calixto, Paul Groth, Sebastian Schelter
arXiv:2606. 29526v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has gained growing attention in large language model (LLM) post-training, yet RL training remains fragile and can suffer from instability or collapse.
By Jing Liang, Hongyao Tang, Yi Ma, Yancheng He, Weixun Wang, Xiaoyang Li, Ju Huang, Wenbo Su, Jinyi Liu, Yan Zheng, Jianye Hao, Bo Zheng
The paper introduces BRIDGE, a bilevel optimization framework that jointly trains a large language model (LLM) and a retriever for agentic reinforcement learning (ARL). It demonstrates that adapting the retriever before the policy yields better rewards, and that BRIDGE outperforms existing methods on seven open‑domain QA benchmarks and medical QA tasks, achieving significant gains in accuracy and reasoning quality.
By Quan Xiao, Mingda Liu, Gaowen Liu, Katsuki Fujisawa, Tianyi Chen
ReST‑RL introduces a unified Reinforced Self‑Training (ReST) policy‑value framework that enhances large language model (LLM) reasoning by combining an optimized ReST‑style GRPO algorithm with a value‑guided search (VM‑MCTS). The ReST‑GRPO component reshapes trajectory distributions to increase reward variance and expose policies to more informative partial states, improving training efficiency. VM‑MCTS trains a Value Model from self‑collected Monte‑Carlo Tree Search targets and uses it during inference to provide precise process signals and verification scores, boosting reasoning accuracy across coding benchmarks and out‑of‑domain math and science tasks.
By Sining Zhoubian, Dan Zhang, Jie Tang
arXiv:2609.22223v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Long-form factuality verification is commonly implemented as a static decompose-search-verify pipeline, with separately prompted modules processing c...
By Kening Zheng, Aoying Zheng, Zhigang Chang, Yazhi Guo, Miaotian Guo, Qingwei Zong, Xianhai Xie, Weiqiang Jin, Chengze Li, Hanrong Zhang, Jie Yang, Wei-Chieh Huang, Lingzhe Zhang, Liancheng Fang, Xin Zou, Hanqian Li, Jiahao Huo, Yibo Yan, Zizhuang Deng, Lei Miao, Wei Guo, Haihong Tang, Bo Zheng, Philip S. Yu