arXiv Computation and Language

Speculative Forking: Turning Idle Wait into Parallel Exploration for Repository Environment Setup

arXiv AI
Jul 28

SpecBox: Speculative Sandbox Scheduling for Efficient LLM Agent Serving

arXiv:2607. 23933v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As LLM agents increasingly rely on the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to invoke isolated external sandboxes, disaggregated sandbox deployment introduces a fundamental tension between resource utilization and interactive tail latency.

By Yihui Zhang (Beihang University), Tianyu Wo (Beihang University), Jinghao Wang (Beihang University), Xiaoyang Sun (University of Leeds), Menghao Zhang (Beihang University), Cangzhou Yuan (Beihang University), Li Li (Beihang University), Chunming Hu (Beihang University), Albert Y. Zomaya (The University of Sydney), Renyu Yang (Beihang University)
arXiv AI
Aug 10

Online Monitoring and Corrective Steering of Programming Agents

arXiv:2608. 06701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fixing GitHub issues in large-scale projects is a long-horizon task, especially when a fix requires changes across multiple locations or the issue description lacks the information needed to localize and repair it.

By Shuyang Liu, Saman Dehghan, Ji Young Kim, Jatin Ganhotra, Martin Hirzel, Reyhaneh Jabbarvand
arXiv AI
Oct 12

Co-Modifying Application Code and Deployment Infrastructure: A Causal Study of AI Agent Pull Requests

The study evaluates 26,999 pull requests that modify both application code and deployment infrastructure, using two large datasets and six AI agent architectures. It finds that such dual‑scope changes occur in only about 4.5% of agent‑generated PRs but lead to two distinct integration outcomes: either significant delays due to CI/CD and provisioning checks, or a high rate of silent merges with reduced human review. The results highlight that current AI agents lack deployment awareness, causing unverified dependencies to slip into production pipelines.

By Mohammad Wathiq Soualhi, Basem Suleiman
arXiv AI
Sep 2

UniACE: A Unified Framework for Evaluating LLM Agentic Capabilities

UniACE is a unified framework that standardizes the evaluation of large language model (LLM) agents by representing each benchmark as an instruction–tool–environment triplet and running models through a shared, task‑agnostic harness in isolated runtimes. It preserves native success criteria, offers an offline mode for dynamic‑resource tasks, and standardizes efficiency metrics, execution records, and failure attribution. Applying UniACE to 7 benchmarks across 24 domains and 15 models revealed significant score shifts, ranking reversals, and sensitivity to evidence representation, highlighting the impact of evaluation configuration on reported agent performance.

By Pengyu Zhu, Lijun Li, Yaxing Lyu, Qianxin Luo, Jingyi Yang, Yi Liu, Tingfeng Hui, Xinyu Yuan, Li Sun, Sen Su, Jing Shao
arXiv AI
Oct 1

E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building Working Codebases from Scratch

E2E-SWE is a benchmark that tests large language models’ ability to create complete, functional software repositories from scratch. It includes 186 tasks across 11 programming languages, each requiring an agent to build an installable project based solely on a natural‑language specification and an empty workspace, while passing a hidden test suite. The benchmark was crafted by software engineers and LLMs, then refined through iterative verification by autonomous agents to ensure clarity and solvability.

By Hantian Ding, Chloe Bi, Jiacheng Zhu, John Yang, Matt Deitke, Pengcheng Yin, Zijian Wang, Rui Hou
arXiv AI
Oct 12

ProgramGym: Scaling Training Environments for Long-Horizon Program Reproduction Agents

ProgramGym introduces a scalable framework for training long-horizon program reproduction agents, comprising Program-Env and Program-Agent components. Program-Env builds verifiable training environments from repositories via a feedback loop that repairs sandbox builds and improves black-box tests, yielding 1,648 environments across C, C++, Go, and Rust. Program-Agent employs a role-isolated workflow of analysis, implementation, and review with revision management, boosting performance on ProgramBench and raising Qwen3.8-27B’s accuracy from 34.87% to 42.84% and surpassing flagship models with fine-tuning.

By Chengyi Yang, Renxu Bao, Jue Hou, Zongpei Teng, Ziheng Wang, Yujie Lin, Chengsong Huang, Junnan Zhu, Delai Qiu, Yining Wang, Shengping Liu, Fei Long, Jinsong Su