arXiv:2503.11841v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Machine Learning (ML) malware detectors rely heavily on crowd-sourced AntiVirus (AV) labels, with platforms like VirusTotal serving as truste...
By Tianwei Lan, Luca Demetrio, Farid Nait-Abdesselam, Yufei Han, Simone Aonzo
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where hidden triggers induce malicious outputs. Existing defenses generally fall into inference-time detection or training-time mitigation, but face two key limitations.
arXiv:2608.00745v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Modern endpoint detection systems face a fundamental tension: signature-based approaches are trivially evaded by polymorphic or adaptive threats, w...
By Zihan Luo
arXiv:2607. 17105v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: It is crucial to safeguard computer networks from evolving network security threats and unknown cyberattacks.
By Khushnaseeb Roshan
arXiv:2608. 05430v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The remarkable instruction-following ability of modern LLMs has enabled their practical use as the minds of agents that can autonomously complete increasingly complex tasks.
By Buzhao Liu, Xinhang Ma, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
The paper demonstrates that a single poisoned data point can successfully create a backdoor in linear models and ReLU neural networks without needing detailed knowledge of the training data. It establishes provable conditions under which this one‑poison attack works with high probability, achieving zero backdooring error while leaving the model’s normal performance largely unaffected. The attack relies only on coarse geometric bounds of the input space and training parameters.
By Thorsten Peinemann, Paula Arnold, Sebastian Berndt, Thomas Eisenbarth, Esfandiar Mohammadi
arXiv:2607. 19894v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where hidden triggers induce malicious outputs.
By Yuxi Li, Zhibo Zhang, Kailong Wang, Xingshuo Han, Ling Shi, Haoyu Wang
arXiv:2507. 18313v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Malware evolves rapidly, forcing machine learning-based detectors to be continuously updated.
By Daniele Ghiani, Daniele Angioni, Giorgio Piras, Angelo Sotgiu, Luca Minnei, Srishti Gupta, Maura Pintor, Fabio Roli, Battista Biggio
arXiv:2608. 02671v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Malware detection using Hardware Performance Counters (HPC) has emerged as a promising solution to improve the security of computing systems as a complement to antivirus software.
By Alireza Abolhasani Zeraatkar, Parnian Shabani Kamran, Inderpreet Kaur, Nagabindu Ramu, Tyler Sheaves, Hussain Al-Asaad
arXiv:2509. 14335v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automated malware classifiers achieve strong detection performance, but auditing requires more than flagging a sample: analysts must explain malicious behaviors and justify them with code evidence.
By Xinran Zheng, Xingzhi Qian, Yiling He, Shuo Yang, Lorenzo Cavallaro
The paper introduces a threat model for malicious intent injection in AI‑native 6G networks and examines four injection strategies: stealth‑mode, random distribution, increasing frequency, and decreasing frequency. It proposes a dual‑path detection framework combining a CNN with TF‑IDF features for supervised detection and an AutoEncoder trained on benign data for one‑class detection. Evaluation shows the framework achieves higher accuracy (0.97) and F1‑score (0.98) than the state‑of‑the‑art baseline.
By Nilesh Chakraborty, Petar Djukic, Burak Kantarci
arXiv:2608. 00732v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Backdoor attacks pose a serious threat to deep neural networks, especially when training relies on third-party data, allowing adversaries to inject malicious behaviors through data poisoning.
By Zixuan Zhu, Rui Wang, Lihua Jing, Jinwen Zhong