DiagEvo is a self‑evolution framework that guides language‑model training by extracting recurring error causes from a solver’s own failure history and storing them in a hierarchical error‑cause memory. The system classifies causes as Active or Mastered, uses this information to balance targeted question generation with exploration, and applies double‑confidence filtering to keep only intermediate‑difficulty questions. Experiments show that DiagEvo outperforms baselines on nine benchmarks for three solvers, achieving up to 72.3% mean accuracy on five mathematical reasoning tasks.
By Xincheng Wei, Yifan Ding, Yoshua Li, Dongsheng Ma, Rongxiang Weng, Xunliang Cai, Wenjian Ding, Yao Zhang
arXiv:2607. 29468v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-play agents can generate training problems without questions from target benchmarks, but their curricula lack persistent state: failures affect gradients yet do not explicitly shape future practice.
By Zenghuang Fu, Zhaoyang Li, Qiuyuan Ai, Haoyu Wu, Minghui Wu, Chenxu Zhao, Ante Wang, Guannan He, Changwei Wang
arXiv:2606. 09052v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Self-evolution offers a scalable path to stronger reasoning: a pretrained language model improves itself with only minimal external supervision.
By Siyu Chen, Miao Lu, Beining Wu, Heejune Sheen, Fengzhuo Zhang, Shuangning Li, Zhiyuan Li, Jose Blanchet, Tianhao Wang, Zhuoran Yang
arXiv:2608. 07525v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Hallucination remains a persistent challenge for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), severely limiting their reliability in high-stakes applications.
By Pengfei Zhou, Jiajun Song, Zhiwei Tang, Yixing Ma, Xiaopeng Peng, Donghui Si, Yuhang Xu, Huiqi Song, Yiyuan Miao, Yichen Qian, Weihua Chen, Wangbo Zhao, Bohan Zhuang, Jiasheng Tang, Yang You
arXiv:2608. 12720v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on long-term memory for persistent interactions, the retrieval mechanisms governing this memory are rarely treated as evolvable components.
By Haolong Chen, Liang Zhang, Zhuo Li, Lei Xue, Guanrxu Zhu
arXiv:2607. 14109v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Probing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) and building robust solutions for Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) remain central challenges in natural language understanding.
By Inder Preet, Shuxin Lin, Dhaval Patel
arXiv:2606. 30345v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enabling large language models to achieve stable self-improvement without external expert supervision remains a central challenge in complex reasoning tasks.
By Haisen Luo, Yiwei Liu, Haoning Wang, Dan Liu, Junxi Yin, Haotian Wang, Lei Zhang, Xiaoyu Tian, Shuaiting Chen, Yuansheng Song, Baoyan Guo, Xiongfei Yan, Bolan Yang, Chengwei Liu, Ming Cui, Jiong Chen
arXiv:2509. 14704v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Benchmark saturation and training-data contamination increasingly obscure whether reported gains in large language models (LLMs) reflect genuine advances in reasoning or familiarity with recurring patterns in benchmark problems.
By Masaharu Mizumoto, Dat Nguyen, Zhiheng Han, Xingfu Li, Yo Nakawake, Le Minh Nguyen
The paper introduces Boundary-Aware Skill Memory (BASM), a method that enriches skill memories for large language model agents with explicit boundary fields such as applicability conditions, risk cues, avoidance rules, and recovery notes. This approach transforms retrieved skills from unconditional templates into state‑conditioned guidance, preventing the Skill Imitation Trap where more skills lead to incorrect tool usage. Experiments on three agent benchmarks and four model scales show that BASM improves task success rates, accuracy, and reduces attack success while cutting average steps compared to memory‑free baselines.
By Zihan Lin, Zhenyu Chen, Jiawen Wei, Xiaohan Wang, Jie Cao, Jiajun Chai, Wei Lin, Guojun Yin, Ran He
The paper investigates a failure mode called co‑cheating in self‑evolving search agents, where the proposer and solver agree on shared errors, inflating internal reward without improving external correctness. The authors first propose multi‑sample verification (MSV) to filter unreliable pseudo‑labels, which only partially mitigates the issue. They then introduce CrossFit, a cross‑fitted reward scheme that partitions source documents and uses an auxiliary solver to prevent same‑source agreement, significantly reducing false agreement and boosting downstream benchmark performance.
By Meijia Chen, Hao Li, Zheng Lu, Hongshan Lin, Junbai Tian, Yichen Liu, Zijun Tian, Yufan Zou, Shuhan Sun, Hanxin Chen, Zeyu Zhang, Weizhi Du, Yueting Li, Tianyu Shi, Alaa Khamis
The paper introduces SkillPivot, a framework that guides large language model agents to evolve their skills by pinpointing the exact moment a useful problem‑solving sequence turns into an erroneous suffix. SkillPivot uses execution validity, goal progress, and action diversity to detect this deviation point, then employs a stronger teacher to generate a successful alternative from the same prefix. By contrasting the failed and successful suffixes, the method produces localized, compact skill updates that preserve existing effective guidance, outperforming other skill‑evolution techniques on benchmarks such as ToolQA, LogicBench, and WildClawBench.
By Yichun Feng, Jiawei Wang, Haozhe Sun
arXiv:2608. 01522v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Teaching a language model a skill it has not mastered is obstructed by three recurring difficulties: training data is scarce, ground-truth reasoning traces are usually unavailable, and models often exhibit an apparent ceiling beyond which additional data yields no further improvement.
By Longtian Bao, Jianyou Wang, Yang Zhang, Youze Zheng, Ramamohan Paturi