arXiv AI August 17, 2026 By Masaharu Mizumoto, Dat Nguyen, Zhiheng Han, Xingfu Li, Yo Nakawake, Le Minh Nguyen

The Metacognitive Bottleneck: Japanese Riddles Reveal Fundamental Limits of Machine Insight and Self-Evaluation in Reasoning AI

arXiv:2509. 14704v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Benchmark saturation and training-data contamination increasingly obscure whether reported gains in large language models (LLMs) reflect genuine advances in reasoning or familiarity with recurring patterns in benchmark problems.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI

Jul 14

Valid $\ne$ Necessary: Diagnosing Latent Inefficiency in Chain-of-Thought

arXiv:2607. 11266v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet it often incurs substantial computational costs due to over-reasoning: the generation of redundant, verbose, or irrelevant steps.

By Daeyeop Lee, Hwanjo Yu

llms efficiency benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 17

Simplicity Paradox: Debunking myths about prompting and datasets for LLM evaluation

arXiv:2607. 14109v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Probing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) and building robust solutions for Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) remain central challenges in natural language understanding.

By Inder Preet, Shuxin Lin, Dhaval Patel

llms nlp benchmarks

arXiv AI

Sep 25

PROOF: Profiling Reliability of Object-Level Facts in Large Language Models

PROOF is a benchmark that profiles the reliability of object-level facts in instruction-tuned language models by converting a frozen Wikidata snapshot into 18,486 English multiple-choice questions grounded in 11,779 semantic facts across 101 classes, 392 properties, and 14 domains. Each question includes an explicit "I don't know" option, a "No correct option" control, and nine controlled formulations, with 1,849 questions designed as no-correct-option traps. The study evaluates 18 open-weight model deployments on 166,374 prompts, revealing wide variability in factual accuracy, sensitivity to wording changes, and the impact of decoder perturbations.

By Andrei Chetvergov, Mikhail Solovev, Timofei Sivoraksha, Stepan Ukolov, Valeriia Kuschenko, Alexander Evseev, Sergey Bolovtsov

llms benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Jun 11

Calibration Drift Under Reasoning: How Chain-of-Thought Budgets Induce Overconfidence in Large Language Models

arXiv:2606. 11211v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The ability of large language models (LLMs) to express calibrated uncertainty is important for safe deployment.

By Prakul Sunil Hiremath, Harshit R. Hiremath

llms

arXiv AI

Jun 2

Verifying Meta-Awareness via Predictive Rewards in Reasoning Models

arXiv:2510. 03259v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent research on reasoning models explores the meta-awareness of language models, including their ability to determine optimal thinking duration, recognize knowledge boundaries, and structure concept-level thinking.

By Yoonjeon Kim, Doohyuk Jang, Eunho Yang

llms reinforcement-learning benchmarks

arXiv Machine Learning

Aug 11

Rethinking Reasoning with MDLMs: Early Exits, Post-hoc Reasoning, and Beyond

arXiv:2510. 19990v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The reasoning paradigm, where language models reason before answering, has enabled breakthroughs on tasks such as mathematical problem-solving.

By Zachary Horvitz, Raghav Singhal, Hao Zou, Carles Domingo-Enrich, Zhou Yu, Rajesh Ranganath, Kathleen McKeown

llms diffusion reinforcement-learning fine-tuning

One email a morning, machine-written

Related stories

Valid $\ne$ Necessary: Diagnosing Latent Inefficiency in Chain-of-Thought

Simplicity Paradox: Debunking myths about prompting and datasets for LLM evaluation

PROOF: Profiling Reliability of Object-Level Facts in Large Language Models

Calibration Drift Under Reasoning: How Chain-of-Thought Budgets Induce Overconfidence in Large Language Models

Verifying Meta-Awareness via Predictive Rewards in Reasoning Models

Rethinking Reasoning with MDLMs: Early Exits, Post-hoc Reasoning, and Beyond