DynaKRAG is a unified framework that learns a state‑conditioned policy to control evidence acquisition in multi‑hop retrieval‑augmented generation. It uses a deterministic validity layer to build an action set, a learned continuation gate to decide between generating an answer or gathering more evidence, and an advantage scorer to rank evidence operations by predicted gain. Across HotpotQA, 2Wiki, and MuSiQue with various backbone models, DynaKRAG achieves top EM and F1 scores, improves token and retrieval efficiency, and enables terminal evidence compression that reduces context size while boosting answer quality.
By Chenyu Zhou, Yaqi Wu, Xiaolei Guo, Jiaqi Huang, Xianfa Zhang, Junxu Zhang, Zhuo Yu, Zhubo Shi, Jianghao Lin, Dongdong Ge
MetaRAG introduces a belief-action aligned policy optimization framework for agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). It incorporates Verify-first Action Generation and Internal Belief Probing to assess whether the current evidence is sufficient before taking an action, and uses a consistency reward gated by answer correctness to guide training. Experiments on seven public QA benchmarks demonstrate that MetaRAG improves the accuracy-efficiency trade-off over existing RL-based agentic RAG baselines, with benefits that transfer across research settings, optimizers, and model backbones.
By Qiuyi Qi, Tian Liang, Jiamu Wang, Jinjian Zhang, Wei Zhou, Pengcheng Zhu, Linjian Mo, Ming Kong, Jie Liu, Qiang Zhu
arXiv:2605. 03534v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds answers in retrieved passages, yet relevance does not guarantee sufficiency: a topical passage may still fail to justify the answer.
By Jingxi Qiu, Zeyu Han, Cheng Huang
FCPRAG introduces a fusion-controlled parametric retrieval‑augmented generation framework that uses a lightweight controller to predict per‑passage fusion scores and sample‑level calibration signals, such as a mixing gate and adaptive temperature. This approach mitigates the bottleneck of evidence‑level fusion when multiple passages are retrieved, enabling selective fusion under informative signals and conservative fusion under uncertainty. Experiments on HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, PopQA, and ComplexWebQuestions demonstrate consistent F1 improvements over standard RAG and parametric RAG baselines, with gains up to 4.65% on 2WikiMultiHopQA and 7.55% on CWQ, while also reducing tuning cost and enhancing robustness to retrieval perturbations.
By Jinchang Zhu, Jindong Li, Yi Ding, Xiaojian Nie, Rong Fu, Shuangyong Song, Haowei He, Menglin Yang
arXiv:2608.31005v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Existing long-video agents acquire evidence through one uniform behavior, ignoring whether the required evidence is concentrated, requires broad occurr...
By Can Zhang, Baofeng Zhang, Xiaotian Han, Junyuan Shang, Yuchen Ding, Shuohuan Wang, Dianhai Yu, Ruirui Li
The paper investigates whether incorporating an evidence-support signal into retrieval evaluation for retrieval‑augmented generation (RAG) improves downstream decision‑making. Across multiple benchmarks and a TREC RAG 2025 setting, the evidence signal alters retriever rankings but its benefits vary: it does not consistently enhance retriever training, its usefulness for system selection depends on generator instructions, and it does not reliably predict answer quality on unseen topics. Human filtering of evidence‑rich passages preserves useful content, yet evaluators disagree on whether this improves final answers, indicating that evidence‑aware evaluation alone does not guarantee better downstream outcomes.
By Utshab Kumar Ghosh, Debayan Mukhopadhyay, Shubham Chatterjee
arXiv:2601. 19827v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) extends large language models (LLMs) beyond parametric knowledge, yet it is unclear when iterative retrieval-reasoning loops meaningfully outperform static RAG, particularly in scientific domains with multi-hop reasoning, sparse domain knowledge, and heterogeneous evidence.
By Mahdi Astaraki, Mohammad Arshi Saloot, Ali Shiraee Kasmaee, Hamidreza Mahyar, Soheila Samiee
arXiv:2608. 06128v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search agents extend large language models beyond static parametric memory by enabling them to acquire and use ex ternal evidence during multi-step reasoning.
By Xingyu Guo, Wei Chen, Linlin Yang, Baochang Zhang
arXiv:2607. 11433v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Omni-modal evidence-seeking QA requires agents to answer questions whose evidence is sparsely distributed across videos, audio, images, web pages, and computation results.
By Ming Ma, Yi Zhu, Yiran Zhong, Feida Zhu, Weigao Sun, Junhan Shi, Lingrui Mei, Tianming Yang, Steven Hoi
arXiv:2606. 29377v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves the factuality of large language models by grounding responses in external evidence, yet real-world deployments remain fragile.
By Soroush Hashemifar, Havva Alizadeh Noughabi, Fattane Zarrinkalam, Ali Dehghantanha
The paper introduces TrustSwap, a counterfactual test that swaps or removes source reliability labels while keeping evidence text constant, to evaluate how retrieval‑augmented fact‑checking models respond across verdict, confidence, and search decisions. Experiments on untrained and RL‑trained models show that confidence and search largely follow labels, yet label changes can flip a significant portion of verdicts, especially in larger models. The authors propose trust‑swap augmentation (TSA) to mitigate this shortcut, demonstrating reduced verdict flip rates and maintained accuracy in several settings, though its effectiveness diminishes at larger model scales.
By Jianchang Su, Yiwei Yang, Wei Zhang
arXiv:2607. 25600v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation improves knowledge-intensive question answering, but indiscriminate retrieval can introduce irrelevant evidence and unnecessary computation.
By Chandan Kumar Sah, Xiaoli Lian, Li Zhang