arXiv:2606. 15527v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Typical video object-centric learning (VOCL) approaches employ slot-based frameworks that rely on reconstruction-driven encoder-decoder architectures, where learning is mediated by two spatial maps: attention maps from the encoder and object maps from the decoder.
By WonJun Moon, Jae-Pil Heo
arXiv:2605. 23045v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Video representation learning has seen tremendous progress in recent years.
By Mantas Skackauskas, Xinyue Hao, Laura Sevilla-Lara
MemoryCard is a video-memory-based augmentation framework designed to improve long-video question answering for Vision‑Language Models. It segments lengthy videos into semantically coherent units—each representing a distinct topic or event—by performing a self‑reading process over the video and aligned utterances. For each unit, the framework generates an event‑level video gist and selects representative visual moments, which are compiled into unified Memory Cards that are used for retrieval and answering questions, yielding up to a 21.8% relative accuracy improvement under comparable visual‑token budgets.
By Qing Yang, Pengcheng Huang, Xinze Li, Zhenghao Liu, Yukun Yan, Yu Gu, Ge Yu, Gang Li, Maosong Sun
arXiv:2607. 13421v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Spatio-Temporal Video Grounding (STVG) aims to retrieve the visual trajectory of a specific object from a video stream as described by a natural language expression.
By Kai Chen, Ming Dai, Wenxuan Cheng, Wankou Yang
The paper introduces STITCH, a training‑free method that partitions videos into semantically meaningful temporal chunks using a frozen video‑text backbone. By detecting changes in the embedding sequence of short video windows, STITCH produces reusable temporal abstractions that can be applied to multiple tasks such as event boundary detection, language‑based moment retrieval, and frame selection for vision‑language models. Experiments show that STITCH performs competitively with specialized methods while requiring no task‑specific training, especially when processing is limited to a few frames or tokens.
By Etienne Casanova, Sevan Brodjian, Pietro Perona
arXiv:2607. 24794v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate superior generalization in fundamental video tasks, restricted context windows limit their long video understanding.
By Linghao Meng, Qiankun Li, Junyuan Mao, Pujin Liao, Zhicheng He, Enbo Zhang, Kun Wang, Yang Liu, Huazhu Fu, Yueming Jin
arXiv:2608. 07408v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study visual persistence in interactive video world models.
By Xindi Wu, Sven Elflein, James Lucas, Olga Russakovsky, Laura Leal-Taix\'e, Despoina Paschalidou, Jonathan Lorraine, Aljo\v{s}a O\v{s}ep
In video understanding, vision-language models (VLMs) must ingest massive numbers of visual tokens, causing the computational and memory cost of the prefill stage to rise sharply. Such visual sequences are highly redundant along the spatio-temporal dimension, yet a high compression ratio is often accompanied by the loss of critical details.
The paper introduces structured video prompting, a training‑free inference‑time technique that augments input videos with lightweight spatial and temporal structure to provide explicit anchors for evidence organization. By applying this method to two video benchmarks and two open video‑language models, the authors demonstrate performance improvements across several tasks, with gains varying by model and task. The study suggests that failures in video‑language models stem not only from reasoning capacity but also from how video evidence is presented during inference.
By Sadegh Mohammadian
arXiv:2606. 05677v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have advanced image and video understanding and can increasingly handle longer visual inputs.
By Shiqiang Lang, Jing Liu, Haoyang He, Peiwen Sun, Yuanteng Chen, Tao Liu, Lan Yang, Longteng Guo, Honggang Zhang
We introduce Predictive State Retrieval (PSR), a task in which a model observes a short video prefix and a temporal question about an object's future state, then retrieves instances from other videos or images that depict that state. Unlike action anticipation, which predicts a label, moment retrieval, which localizes an observed event within a video, or video generation, which synthesizes pixels, PSR combines anticipation with cross-instance retrieval across multiple temporal horizons.
arXiv:2608.30388v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Cross-view video representation learning aims to capture viewpoint-invariant action semantics despite substantial appearance changes across egocentri...
By Youngchae Chee, Hosu Lee, Sungjune Park, Junho Kim, Yong Man Ro