arXiv Computer Vision

How Many Posterior Samples? Calibrated Stopping for Adaptive Sensing

The paper investigates how to decide when to stop collecting posterior samples in classification‑oriented adaptive sensing. It shows that a simple threshold‑based plug‑in rule does not guarantee the desired confidence level, and proposes calibrated fixed‑sample and finite‑horizon sequential stopping rules that control the false‑declaration probability. Experiments on MNIST demonstrate that the sequential rule can reduce sensing cost the most, and that a curtailment strategy can save up to 62% of posterior samples while maintaining accuracy.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

Classification-oriented adaptive sensing via posterior sampling

The paper proposes a classification-oriented adaptive sensing method that uses posterior sampling from diffusion models. It leverages the closed-form posterior covariance of a class-conditional Gaussian mixture model to separate within-class and between-class uncertainty, estimating these terms from diffusion posterior samples via calibrated soft classifier outputs. Experiments on MNIST and CIFAR-10 demonstrate that this approach can achieve better classification accuracy for a given measurement cost compared to reconstruction-oriented methods, while also quantifying the associated reconstruction quality.

By Andriy Enttsel, Maxime Rousselot, Vincent Corlay
arXiv AI
2d ago

From Discovery to Decision: Finite-Budget Recoverability in LLM Voting

The paper studies how voting over multiple large language model (LLM) responses can be optimized under a fixed call budget. It introduces a recoverability threshold that quantifies the gap between discovering a correct answer and ensuring it wins the plurality vote, showing that the candidate set can only grow while the set of reachable winners can only shrink. The authors also present a gold‑free locking certificate that identifies the earliest prefix where all remaining continuations produce the same fixed‑budget output, and demonstrate empirical gains in accuracy and call efficiency through input permutation and exact locking.

By Shaoang Li, Jian Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

On Cost-Aware Designs for Sequential Hypothesis Testing

The paper introduces Cost-Aware Sequential Hypothesis Testing (CASHT), where a decision-maker selects sensing actions with varying random costs to identify the true hypothesis under an average-error constraint while minimizing expected total cost. For fixed costs, the optimal expected total cost scales as Θ(log(1/δ)) and can be achieved by Multihypothesis Sequential Probability Ratio Test-based procedures. The authors extend the framework to random costs under ex-post and ex-ante revelation models, analyze when action cancellation reduces cost, and demonstrate through simulations that CA variants consistently lower total cost compared to classical methods.

By George Vershinin, Asaf Cohen, Omer Gurewitz
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Conditional Validity for Adaptive Modality Acquisition: When the Policy Chooses Its Own Calibration Group

The paper introduces RouteCert, a method for ensuring risk control in multimodal systems that acquire inputs adaptively. It shows that conditional calibration can remain valid even when the acquisition policy determines the calibration group, and provides two finite‑sample constructions: threshold‑free routing with terminal‑pattern calibration and simultaneous validation of policy‑pattern pairs. Experiments on a clinical ECG task and masked multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that RouteCert achieves low disagreement rates and competitive answered fractions while validating each acquisition stage separately.

By Melika Baghi