arXiv:2606. 29932v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon strategic planning in complex strategy games demands concurrent reasoning across multiple decision domains under imperfect information and sparse reward.
By Tianyu Jin, Shuo Chen, Yida Wang, Liuyu Xiang, Yingzhuo Liu, Zhiyao Jiang, Yexin Li, Zhaofeng He
arXiv:2607. 20064v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon tasks require sustained perception, reasoning, and exploration, and are a persistent challenge for large language model (LLM) agents.
By Alexis Fox, Junlin Wang, Paul Rosu, Bhuwan Dhingra
arXiv:2606. 18950v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often struggle with strategic reasoning, i.
By San Kim, Daechul Ahn, Reokyoung Kim, Hyeonbeom Choi, Seungyeon Jwa, Jonghyun Choi
arXiv:2607. 22732v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based game agents often perform poorly on more complex tasks.
By Mohit Jiwatode, Ronja Fuchs, Robin Schm\"ocker, Bodo Rosenhahn, Alexander Dockhorn
arXiv:2510. 05592v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Outcome-driven reinforcement learning has advanced reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but prevailing tool-augmented approaches train a single, monolithic policy that interleaves thoughts and tool calls under full context; this scales poorly with long horizons and diverse tools and generalizes weakly to new scenarios.
By Zhuofeng Li, Haoxiang Zhang, Seungju Han, Sheng Liu, Jianwen Xie, Yu Zhang, Yejin Choi, James Zou, Pan Lu
arXiv:2607. 08894v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown promise in multi-step planning tasks, but existing approaches like LATS (Language Agent Tree Search) and ReAct rely heavily on LLM inference during planning, leading to high computational costs and stochastic behavior.
By Maureese Williams, Dymitr Nowicki
arXiv:2404. 02039v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Game environments provide rich, controllable settings that stimulate many aspects of real-world complexity.
By Sihao Hu, Tiansheng Huang, Gaowen Liu, Ramana Rao Kompella, Fatih Ilhan, Selim Furkan Tekin, Yichang Xu, Zachary Yahn, Ling Liu
Translating natural-language planning intent into verified plans is a longstanding challenge: people communicate goals in language, while classical planners require formal PDDL specifications. Recent agentic frameworks bridge this gap by orchestrating a pool of specialized repair agents inside a verifier-checked refinement loop, but the orchestrator at the centre is itself a prompted frontier LLM, paying a frontier-LLM API call at every refinement step.
arXiv:2608. 12626v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Strategic reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) within long-horizon environments is often limited by inconsistent subgoals.
By Yi Wu, Zhimin Hu
arXiv:2607. 17973v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Latent world models have emerged as a powerful planning paradigm by learning action-conditioned predictive dynamics and using them as internal simulators to imagine and evaluate candidate action sequences.
By Letian Cheng, Qi Zhang, Yisen Wang
arXiv:2608. 07905v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Embodied agents using LLM-based planners often struggle with physical hallucinations, poor generalization to long-horizon tasks, and lack of environmental awareness.
By Chen Li, Sijie Cheng, Yuelin Zhang, Junxi Li, Maozhi Huang, Yang Liu, Wenbing Huang
arXiv:2606. 10507v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities as autonomous agents across a wide range of tasks, their performance often degrades in multi-turn long-horizon agentic tasks.
By Juncheng Diao, Zhicong Lu, Peiguang Li, Yongwei Zhou, Changyuan Tian, Qingbin Li, Rongxiang Weng, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai