The paper introduces localized case-based feature importance (CBFI), a framework that decomposes individual predictions in complex tabular models into distinct structural components, separating independent main effects from pure interactions. Unlike additive explanations such as SHAP and LIME, CBFI explicitly captures feature synergies, enabling the recovery of latent interaction structures. Experiments on wine quality classification and medical insurance regression, along with fidelity tests and synthetic benchmarks, show that CBFI accurately disentangles interactions hidden by additive models and aligns with the nonlinear dependencies in gradient boosting and deep neural networks.
Background: Understanding individual predictions in complex tabular models remains challenging, as existing additive frameworks like SHAP and LIME often obscure structural logic by absorbing nonlinear...
The paper introduces Adaptive Derivative-Ordered Random Explanation (ADORE), a unified framework that uses first- and second-order derivatives to capture nonlinear feature interactions and feature-sample dynamics. ADORE combines global feature importance with local sample contributions, quantifying both magnitude and direction of feature impact while identifying critical samples. It achieves computational efficiency via randomized SVD and dynamic sparsity detection, outperforming LIME and SHAP across tabular, text, and image data, and is released as an open-source Python package on GitHub.
arXiv:2606. 06861v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding nonlinear feature interactions is crucial in science and engineering, yet standard multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) often capture such interactions only implicitly, leading to entangled representations that can impair robustness and interpretability.
The paper proposes a new evaluation test for explanation methods: if an explanation accurately captures how a model uses its features, one should be able to reconstruct the model’s predictions from it. The authors convert explanations into predictors by summing feature effects and assess how well these predictors reproduce the model on unseen data, without any fitting. They apply this test to partial dependence plots, accumulated local effects, SHAP, and LIME across multiple datasets and model families, showing that the best method depends on feature dependence and that some existing quality metrics can favor flawed explanations.
The paper introduces a hypothesis‑testing framework that embeds feature importance methods (FIMs) within a Weight of Evidence (WoE) analysis. By quantifying how strongly observed evidence supports a given hypothesis—whether from domain knowledge, ground truth, or the FIM itself—the approach evaluates FIM alignment and variability. The authors provide theoretical links between WoE and attribution variance and demonstrate the method on LIME and SHAP explanations across varied reference hypotheses.
The paper introduces a straightforward evaluation method for explanation techniques: by converting each explanation into a predictor that sums the feature effects, the authors assess how accurately this predictor reproduces the original model’s predictions on unseen data. This approach applies to any explanation expressible as a function of features and is demonstrated on PDP, ALE, SHAP, and LIME. The authors theoretically show that summing partial dependence curves yields the optimal additive summary when features are independent, but this property fails with dependent features, and empirical results across diverse datasets confirm that the best-performing method depends on feature dependence.
The paper introduces Actionable Case-Based Feature Importance (A‑CBFI), a framework that integrates structural causal models with counterfactual recourse for tabular machine learning. A‑CBFI isolates synergistic interaction bottlenecks and releases suppressive structural locks, concentrating over 98.3% of intervention effort on diagnosed root causes. Empirical tests in finance and healthcare show a 76.9% reduction in active human intervention while keeping recourse costs comparable to exhaustive causal methods.
arXiv:2607. 17783v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predictive process monitoring supports the optimization and control of operational business processes by forecasting the future state or outcome of ongoing cases.
The paper introduces Conditionally Additive Local Models (CALMs), a new class of interpretable machine learning models that balance the simplicity of Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) with the accuracy of GA$^2$Ms. CALMs allow multiple univariate shape functions per feature, each active in distinct input subregions defined by simple logical conditions on interacting features, thereby capturing interactions while maintaining local additivity. A distillation-based training pipeline identifies homogeneous regions with limited interactions and fits interpretable shape functions via region-aware backfitting, leading to performance that consistently outperforms GAMs and rivals GA$^2$Ms on diverse classification and regression tasks.
Predictive process monitoring supports the optimization and control of operational business processes by forecasting the future state or outcome of ongoing cases. While deep neural networks have achieved strong performance for these tasks by modeling sequential dependencies in event logs, their black-box nature limits trust and practical adoption.
arXiv:2603. 02221v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In clinical tabular prediction, classical machine learning models with feature engineering often outperform neural methods.
arXiv:2603.02221v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In clinical tabular prediction, classical machine learning models with feature engineering often outperform neural methods. LLMs are increasi...