The paper introduces Traverse, an autonomous web‑search agent that manages its search process through three states—Rubric, Answer, and Verify—while using a Seal Memory tool for active context management. Reinforcement learning is employed to train the agent, but a training instability called Seal Collapse is mitigated by training only the final segment after context management. The resulting 35B model achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on BrowseComp and related benchmarks, outperforming comparable open‑source systems.
By Jingyuan Ma, Lynx Aster, He Zhang, Siyao Song, Weijie Yuan, Zhe Zhang, Kai Jia, Zhifang Sui
AdaSearch introduces a two‑stage reinforcement learning framework that separates problem solving from the decision to search in large language models. By using an F1‑based decision metric, it explicitly evaluates when external search is needed, reducing unnecessary search calls while maintaining high question‑answering performance. Experiments show that AdaSearch improves search‑decision quality with only a minor impact on accuracy compared to always‑search strategies.
By Tzu-Han Lin, Wei-Lin Chen, Chen-An Li, Hung-yi Lee, Yun-Nung Chen, Yu Meng
arXiv:2608. 06714v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent systems for optimizing prompts, programs, and ML workflows typically rely on explicit outer-loop controllers such as evolutionary search, bandits, or textual-gradient methods.
By Junbo Li, Boyi Liu, Canwen Xu, Yite Wang, Yuxiong He, Zhangyang Wang, Qiang Liu, Zhewei Yao
arXiv:2601. 15141v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Agentic Reinforcement Learning (RL) has empowered Large Language Models (LLMs) to utilize tools like Python interpreters for complex problem-solving.
By Tianshi Xu, Yuteng Chen, Meng Li
Recent systems for optimizing prompts, programs, and ML workflows typically rely on explicit outer-loop controllers such as evolutionary search, bandits, or textual-gradient methods. We ask a fundamentally different question: how much of this search policy can be internalized by a single tool-using agent?
arXiv:2608. 05628v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Although agent skills equip LLMs with reusable procedural knowledge, manual maintenance suffers from high costs, unscalability, and misalignment.
By Yuru Feng, Yaoqi Chen, Beidi Zhao, Qianxi Zhang, Xinjiang Wang, Jianan Lu, Zhirui Wang, Shusen Xu, Zengzhong Li, Qi Chen
arXiv:2606. 02373v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search agents are often trained as policies over growing transcripts: the model must decide how to search while also remembering what it has seen, which evidence is useful, which constraints remain open, and which claims have actually been checked.
By Pengcheng Jiang, Zhiyi Shi, Kelly Hong, Xueqiang Xu, Jiashuo Sun, Jimeng Sun, Hammad Bashir, Jiawei Han
arXiv:2607. 10738v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in equipping Large Language Models (LLMs) with search tools and outcome-reward reinforcement learning (RL) have achieved new state-of-the-art results on open-domain QA tasks.
By Fengji Zhang, Tianyu Fan, Yuxiang Zheng, Xinyao Niu, Chengen Huang, Jacky Keung, Bei Chen
arXiv:2608. 12764v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep search agents operate over trajectories spanning dozens of steps, yet standard reinforcement learning provides only a single outcome reward per trajectory, which is far too sparse for effective credit assignment.
By Haoze Wu, Chuqiao Kuang, Tianyi Zhuang, Xiaoguang Li
arXiv:2607. 23263v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deciding whether a trajectory actually fulfills its instruction governs how we measure computer-use agents on long-horizon graphical-user-interface tasks and how we train them with reinforcement learning.
By Yang Wan, Zhenhao Zhang, Jierui Wang, Linchao Zhu
Although agent skills equip LLMs with reusable procedural knowledge, manual maintenance suffers from high costs, unscalability, and misalignment. Real-world deployments thus require autonomous, on-demand skill evolution at test time, constrained by limited interaction budgets and a lack of training or validation sets.
arXiv:2602. 11351v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Proactive large language model (LLM) agents aim to actively plan, query, and interact over multiple turns, enabling efficient task completion beyond passive instruction following and making them essential for real-world, user-centric applications.
By Yihang Yao, Zhepeng Cen, Haohong Lin, Shiqi Liu, Zuxin Liu, Jiacheng Zhu, Zhang-Wei Hong, Laixi Shi, Ding Zhao