arXiv AI

VisInteract: Towards Dynamic Interactive Text-to-Visualization under Imperfect Queries

VisInteract introduces a new paradigm for Text-to-Visualization that treats imperfect user queries as a dynamic, interaction-driven problem, requiring the system to recover true intent through multi-turn dialogue. The authors present VisInteract-Bench, the first benchmark for interactive Text-to-Vis, featuring controlled imperfection injection, a realistic user agent, and dual-perspective automated evaluation. They also propose Vis-MCTS, an enhanced Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm that incorporates progressive widening, cross-rollout information sharing, and dimension-aware reward decomposition, achieving significant performance gains over existing baselines.

arXiv AI
Oct 27

RSIV-Harness: A Recursive Self-Improvement Harness Framework for Open-Domain Conversational Text-to-Visualization

RSIV-Harness is a framework that keeps language model weights fixed while recursively improving the surrounding harness based on failure traces, using a four-layer evaluation to ensure stability. It addresses challenges in open-domain conversational text-to-visualization, such as ambiguous user requests, data source discovery, and iterative chart refinement. The introduced ODAC-Vis benchmark evaluates these capabilities across 640 tasks, and experiments show significant gains in executability and chart structure after a single RSIV-Harness iteration.

By Jiawei Lu, Chen Zhang, Jinwei Lu, Yuanwei Song, Yuanfeng Song, Raymond Chi-Wing Wong
arXiv AI
Aug 25

ATP-Bench: Towards Agentic Tool Planning for MLLM Interleaved Generation

ATP‑Bench proposes a new benchmark for evaluating agentic tool planning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that generate interleaved text-and-image responses. The benchmark contains 7,702 QA pairs, including 1,592 visual‑question‑answer pairs, across eight categories and 25 visual‑critical intents, all verified by humans. A Multi‑Agent MLLM‑as‑a‑Judge (MAM) system is introduced to assess tool‑call precision, missed opportunities, and overall response quality without relying on ground‑truth references.

By Yinuo Liu, Zi Qian, Heng Zhou, Jiahao Zhang, Yajie Zhang, Zhihang Li, Mengyu Zhou, Erchao Zhao, Xiaoxi Jiang, Guanjun Jiang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

PaperBanana-Interact: Scientific Diagram Refinement with Multi-Turn Human Feedback

PaperBanana-Interact is a multi-agent system designed to refine scientific diagrams through multi-turn human feedback. The authors introduce MTPaperBananaBench, a benchmark with 292 images and 3,518 user requirements, and a user simulator that generates natural language feedback at each turn. Experiments show that PaperBanana-Interact consistently improves diagram quality, outperforming baseline systems by 11.9–18.6 points and reducing forgetting by 3.7–6.2 points.

By Xueqing Wu, Ashwin Balasubramanian, Bingxuan Li, Dawei Zhu, Kai-Wei Chang, Yale Song, Yiwen Song, Rui Meng, Tomas Pfister, Nanyun Peng
arXiv Computation and Language
2d ago

VisCodeBench: a new benchmark dataset for Text-to-Vis reflecting real-world practice

VisCodeBench is a new text‑to‑visualisation benchmark comprising 2,672 samples across educational, scientific, and general‑audience domains, designed to evaluate how well large language models can generate visualisations from natural‑language requests. The study benchmarks three visualisation systems—Codex, Claude Code, and LIDA—paired with various LLMs on seven metrics covering execution, chart content, and visual quality. Results show that while basic execution is near‑solved, no system reliably reproduces reference data, with the best data similarity at 0.81 and dropping to 0.69 on the hardest subset; system design and model choice both significantly influence performance, and latency remains a practical challenge.

By Hy Nguyen, Thomas James Elton, Ella Wilson, Andrew Reeson, Cecile Paris, Josiah Poon, Jonathan K. Kummerfeld
arXiv AI
Oct 9

When Interfaces Speak: Data-Aware Generative UI Harness for Active Interaction

The paper introduces GenUI‑Harness, a multi‑agent system that pairs a Tool Agent for data retrieval with a GUI Coder Agent that generates structured interfaces to aid human‑agent interaction. It tackles training challenges by using Dynamic UX for lightweight reward collection and Reward Auditor to monitor reward quality. The authors present UI‑TAU Bench, a benchmark of 1,300 database‑backed tasks, and show that GenUI‑Harness improves Pass@3 scores and reduces dialogue rounds compared to existing models.

By Xiaolong Li, Xiaohan Xu, Jinyang Li, Xinnuo Xu, Ge Qu, Nan Huo, Jack Williams, Reynold Cheng
arXiv AI
Sep 25

IDRBench: Benchmarking the Interactive Capabilities of Deep Research Agents

IDRBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate the interactive capabilities of deep research agents that use large language models. It introduces controlled opportunities for clarification within a common workflow, comparing autonomous and interactive trajectories by measuring task‑specific report alignment and interaction cost. Experiments on 100 tasks with seven LLMs show that interaction consistently improves alignment, though its effectiveness varies depending on the agents’ questions and feedback integration.

By Yingchaojie Feng, Qiang Huang, Xiaoya Xie, Zhaorui Yang, Jun Yu, Wei Chen, Anthony K. H. Tung
arXiv AI
Sep 28

The Hard Part Comes After Search: Benchmarking Web Agents on Synthesizing, Organizing, and Displaying Knowledge

The paper introduces KNOWS, a benchmark for evaluating web agents that act as assistants by retrieving, synthesizing, and presenting information across complex, multi-step browser tasks. It outlines a task design rubric, evaluation protocol combining deterministic checks with LLM judgments, and reports that current agents achieve only modest success, with the best performing agent succeeding on less than 3% of tasks. The study highlights significant gaps in agents’ tool use, visual understanding, and long‑horizon reasoning.

By Alexander Gill, Md Farhan Ishmam, Xuyen Nguyen, Neha Bhat, Parker Henry DeYoung, Fateme Hashemi Chaleshtori, Nathan Stringham, Kenneth Marino, Ana Marasovi\'c
arXiv AI
Jun 10

V-REX: Benchmarking Exploratory Visual Reasoning via Chain-of-Questions

arXiv:2512. 11995v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While many vision-language models (VLMs) are developed to answer well-defined, straightforward questions with highly specified targets, as in most benchmarks, they often struggle in practice with complex open-ended tasks, which usually require multiple rounds of exploration and reasoning in the visual space.

By Chenrui Fan, Yijun Liang, Shweta Bhardwaj, Kwesi Cobbina, Ming Li, Tianyi Zhou