arXiv:2511. 07457v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in modeling sequential textual data and generalizing across diverse tasks.
By Jiarui Feng, Donghong Cai, Yixin Chen, Muhan Zhang
arXiv:2606. 05382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-table question answering requires models to retrieve relevant evidence, link schemas, and perform compositional reasoning across relational tables.
By Ankit Pratap Singh, Xin Su, Phillip Howard
arXiv:2607. 25579v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Entity alignment (EA) identifies entities across knowledge graphs (KGs) that refer to the same real-world object.
By Xinran Liu, Shengtao Li, Shouqian Shi, Ge Wang, Xin-Wei Yao
arXiv:2604. 12176v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Relational reasoning is the ability to infer relations that jointly bind multiple entities, attributes, or variables.
By Lukas Fesser, Yasha Ektefaie, Ada Fang, Sham M. Kakade, Marinka Zitnik
arXiv:2607. 01972v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are often asked to produce JSON conforming to a fixed schema, powering information extraction, tool calling, agentic planning, and knowledge-graph construction.
By Jan Drchal
Large language models (LLMs) are often asked to produce JSON conforming to a fixed schema, powering information extraction, tool calling, agentic planning, and knowledge-graph construction. Measuring how closely an output matches a gold reference is essential yet surprisingly hard: exact match is brittle, text similarity ignores structure, and an LLM judge is expensive, opaque, and non-deterministic.
arXiv:2606. 26530v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) contains tasks that require summarizing patterns from limited grid samples and predicting output grids.
By Yuxuan Yang, Feiyang Li, Yile Wang
arXiv:2607. 28680v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Entity linking in tables matches short and ambiguous cell mentions to their corresponding knowledge-base entities.
By Yixin Peng, Kehao Li, Stefan Decker
arXiv:2605. 04539v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), the efficient alternative to PPO-based RLHF, falls short on knowledge-intensive generation: standard preference signals from human annotators or LLM judges exhibit a systematic verbosity bias that rewards fluency over logical correctness.
By Qiming Bao, Juho Leinonen, Paul Denny, Michael J. Witbrock
arXiv:2604. 20140v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is an effective framework for aligning large language models with human preferences, but it struggles with complex reasoning tasks.
By Darsh Kachroo, Arjun Prasaath Anbazhagan, Adriana Caraeni, Brennan Lagasse, Kevin Zhu
arXiv:2606. 15633v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise for reasoning over Text-Attributed Graphs (TAGs).
By Donald Loveland, Puja Trivedi, Ari Weinstein, Edward W Huang, Danai Koutra
arXiv:2606. 04535v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) offer bidirectional attention and parallel generation, enabling them to exploit global context and naturally support format-constrained tasks like parseable JSON or reasoning templates.
By Boyan Han, Yiwei Wang, Yi Song, Yujun Cai, Chi Zhang