arXiv:2606. 26530v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) contains tasks that require summarizing patterns from limited grid samples and predicting output grids.
arXiv:2606. 26530v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC;~\citealp{chollet2019measure}) contains tasks that require summarizing patterns from limited grid samples and predicting output grids.
PotARCin expands the ARC benchmark by evaluating abstract reasoning across five dimensions—Definition, Classification, Constrained Generation, Editing, and Inversion—using programmatic generation of new task instances. The study shows a 25‑52 percentage‑point performance gap between standard ARC evaluation and PotARCin, and reveals that multi‑dimensional assessment can reorder models that appear equivalent under single‑metric accuracy. Additionally, a new held‑out set, P‑ARC, demonstrates low model accuracy (1‑8%) across all dimensions, highlighting the need for more comprehensive tests of abstract reasoning.
arXiv:2608.30627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As language-model compute continues to scale, high-quality training data is becoming an increasingly important bottleneck. Conventional next-token pred...
The paper introduces a two‑step test‑time training protocol, Embed‑TTT, for Vision ARC (VARC) that first fine‑tunes only the task embedding and then fine‑tunes the backbone. This approach consistently produces task embeddings that better align with the underlying rules, improves retrieval and linear probing, and recovers the geometric structure of parametric rules. Even fine‑tuning only the tiny embedding component solves a significant portion of ARC‑AGI‑1, ConceptARC, and Mini‑ARC tasks, while the full two‑step pipeline further enhances performance and demonstrates compositional rule interpolation.
arXiv:2509. 23982v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Preference alignment is a critical step in making Large Language Models (LLMs) useful and aligned with (human) preferences.
arXiv:2609.17019v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has been proven to be effective, it often leads to overthinking, resulting in computational overhead, inference...
The paper introduces CodeRQ-Bench, the first benchmark for assessing large language model reasoning quality across coding tasks such as generation, summarization, and classification. It analyzes over a thousand mismatches from existing evaluators, identifies recurring limitations, and derives design insights that lead to a new two‑stage evaluator, VERA. Experiments show VERA outperforms strong baselines, improving AUCROC by up to 0.26 and AUPRC by up to 0.21 on four datasets.
arXiv:2512. 14332v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The field of Language Reasoning Models (LRMs) has been very active over the past few years with advances in training and inference techniques enabling LRMs to reason longer, and more accurately.
arXiv:2609.10445v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reasoning language models have made substantial advances on a variety of complex tasks, yet their capabilities remain overwhelmingly English-centric: m...
arXiv:2608.23256v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work proposes next-chunk reasoning RL for leveraging no-CoT data---corpora such as worked solutions and textbook derivations that contain reason...
arXiv:2606. 14142v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted as backbones for Generative Recommendation (GR), promising access to pretrained world knowledge.
arXiv:2607. 14895v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reasoning language models (RLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in domains such as mathematics and coding.