arXiv Machine Learning By Philipp Guevorguian, Menua Bedrosian, Tigran Fahradyan, Gayane Chilingaryan, Armen Aghajanyan, Hrant Khachatrian

Small Molecule Optimization with Large Language Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper introduces Mol-E, an evolutionary algorithm that leverages large language models trained on molecular data to generate candidate molecules. Mol-E achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on the Practical Molecular Optimization benchmark, scoring 17.500 in the task‑agnostic regime and 20.551 in the task‑informed regime. It also outperforms baseline methods in multi‑property optimization tasks involving docking against DRD2, MK2, and AChE.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 15

PMO-Dock: Benchmarking Docking, Specificity, and Generalization in Molecular Optimization

PMO-Dock introduces a standardized benchmark for docking‑based molecular optimization, comprising 25 tasks that span hit generation, lead optimization, and a specificity task that rewards strong on‑target binding while penalizing off‑target interactions. The protocol separates model development from final evaluation, using validation tasks for hyperparameter tuning and held‑out test tasks evaluated under a strict oracle budget to mimic realistic drug‑discovery constraints. Four diverse methods—Saturn, GenMol, Genetic‑guided GFlowNet, and ChemLlama—were benchmarked, revealing no single method dominates across all tasks and highlighting limited hyperparameter transferability, which underscores the need for method‑dependent selection strategies.

By Gor Simonyan, Tatevik Abrahamyan, Narek Abelyan, Tigran Fahradyan, Hrant Khachatrian
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 16

Closed-Loop Molecular Inverse Design with Semantic LLM Surrogates

The paper introduces LoopMol, a closed‑loop molecular inverse‑design framework that uses a large language model (LLM) as a surrogate to reason directly over task instructions, SMILES optimization histories, and oracle feedback. At each iteration, the LLM selects informative reference molecules and optionally a concise guidance sentence, conditioning the next generation round and producing an inspectable optimization trace. Experiments on six drug and material tasks across three Llama‑based backbones show that the LLM‑based variant outperforms one‑shot generation and competes with or surpasses Gaussian‑process Bayesian optimization, with performance varying by task type.

By Yaoyao Xu, Xinjian Zhao, Xiaozhuang Song, Lei Bai, Tianshu Yu