arXiv:2608. 19472v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Lexical semantic change (LSC) is commonly modelled through vector-space representations, but these approaches often provide limited insight into which aspects of usage are changing.
The BD-LSC dataset introduces a bi‑directional lexical semantic change benchmark that tracks sense gain, loss, and stability across three time periods, while the ST‑WSD dataset offers fine‑grained, instance‑level sense annotations for words that blend slang and standard usage. These resources enable systematic evaluation of diverse models—including unsupervised clustering, supervised learning, transformer‑based approaches, and large language models—on tasks such as exact sense matching and multi‑label accuracy. The evaluation shows that few‑shot GPT‑4o performs best overall, yet all systems struggle with rare slang senses, highlighting a key open challenge in the field.
The paper introduces Coupled Usage–Sense Processes (CUSP), a method that models lexical semantic change by coupling contextual distributions through latent usage components and using Markov composition to link adjacent time periods. CUSP quantifies change magnitude and timing, separates variation into component movement and internal reorganization, and attributes changes to specific transported component pairs. The approach is validated on synthetic data, English and German corpora, and a large corpus of US court opinions, providing detailed, text‑grounded insights into how word meanings evolve over time.
The paper evaluates whether diachronic word embeddings can track semantic change in Sanskrit, an ancient low‑resource language with complex phonological and morphological features. A 2.7‑million‑token corpus covering four canonical periods is processed with a neural sandhi splitter and lemmatizer, and per‑period embeddings are trained. Validation against a curated set of 21 historical shifts shows that 19 shifts align with philological expectations, supporting the method’s applicability to Sanskrit.
The study investigates whether contextual embeddings can detect meaning changes in scientific terminology beyond traditional frequency counts. Using Astrophysics and NLP corpora from 2010 to 2024, the authors extract candidate terms with KeyBERT, filter for significant frequency rises, and then evaluate semantic drift via multiple embedding‑based metrics. Results show that frequency methods slightly outperform embedding metrics in aligning with expert judgments, yet embedding‑only detections (e.g., "primordial black holes") reveal critical conceptual shifts missed by frequency alone, suggesting complementary value.
arXiv:2607.00171v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Text embeddings are standard for semantic similarity tasks, yet their evaluation remains an open challenge. Current benchmarks are static, cover on...
arXiv:2608. 03507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Historical language change affects morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, yet computational studies typically examine these levels with incompatible representations and therefore cannot determine whether they evolve together across languages.
arXiv:2607. 11889v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models trained on unrestricted internet corpora inevitably embed information from the future, introducing lookahead bias that compromises the validity of backtests and causal inference in finance and the social sciences.
arXiv:2608. 16621v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-augmented and agentic question-answering systems increasingly re-derive the meaning of a corpus at query time.
CHRONOBERG is a temporally structured corpus of English book texts covering 250 years, curated from Project Gutenberg and enriched with temporal annotations. It enables quantification of lexical semantic change via time‑sensitive Valence‑Arousal‑Dominance analysis and the creation of historically calibrated affective lexicons. Experiments show that language models trained sequentially on CHRONOBERG struggle to encode diachronic shifts, highlighting the need for temporally aware training and evaluation pipelines.
Retrieval-augmented and agentic question-answering systems increasingly re-derive the meaning of a corpus at query time. Put plainly, instead of re-deriving what a corpus means on every question, the work is done once when a document arrives and is thereafter merely consulted -- a compiler, not an interpreter, of meaning.
arXiv:2609.22136v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text anomaly detection, the task of identifying text instances that deviate from normal language patterns, is crucial for language-driven application...