arXiv Machine Learning

Genesis Steering: Better Activation Steering Through Training Data

The paper introduces genesis steering, a method that derives a steering vector from contrastive examples in a model’s own fine‑tuning data, and proposes using membership inference to build proxy datasets when such data are unavailable. Two theoretical results are presented on optimal displacement to the decision boundary and reduced proxy‑estimation bias. Experiments on T"ulu‑3‑8B and Llama‑3.1‑8B‑Instruct show that safety data from T"ulu‑3‑8B’s training mixture produce stronger steering than external datasets, and that membership‑based proxy construction can achieve competitive performance.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

IDEEA: training-free Input-Dependent stEEring via Activation cluster matching

IDEA is a training‑free, input‑dependent steering method for large language models that matches activations to cluster‑specific directions aligned with a target concept. It clusters positive and negative activation supports per attention head, solves an optimal‑matching problem to create a pool of cluster‑conditional directions, and selects the best match for each input at inference time. This approach preserves the input’s original representation while improving the truth × info rate on TruthfulQA by an average of 9.9% (up to 23.5%) over input‑independent baselines.

By Zheng Wang, Muchen Li, Renjie Liao, Yan Leng
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

IDEEA: training-free Input-Dependent stEEring via Activation cluster matching

IDEA: training-free Input-Dependent stEEring via Activation cluster matching (IDEEA) is a method that steers large language models by injecting bias into selected activations at inference time, without requiring weight updates. Unlike existing training-free steering approaches that use a single, input-independent direction, IDEEA clusters positive and negative activation supports per attention head and solves an optimal-matching problem to create a set of cluster-conditional directions. At inference, IDEEA selects the direction that best matches the input’s activation, aligning the model toward a target concept while preserving the input’s original representation, and achieves a 9.9% average improvement in truth × info rate on TruthfulQA compared to the best input-independent baseline.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 9

Towards Understanding Steering Strength

arXiv:2602. 02712v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A popular approach to post-training control of large language models (LLMs) is the steering of intermediate latent representations.

By Magamed Taimeskhanov, Samuel Vaiter, Damien Garreau
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Task-Level Natural Language Priors as Learning Signals for Low-Resource LLM Training

Task-Level Natural Language Priors as Learning Signals for Low-Resource LLM Training proposes Prior-Guided Tuning (PGT), a training approach that treats natural-language priors as auxiliary learning signals rather than just input context. The method introduces Contrastive Prior Steering (CPS), which adds positive and negative prior-conditioned auxiliary losses while preserving the original supervised objective. Experiments on AmbiMath, Jigsaw, and MNLI/HANS demonstrate that CPS consistently outperforms plain and prompt fine-tuning, achieving high accuracy and significant gains with limited training data.

By Jian Gao, Xiao Zhang, Xun Zhu, Miao Li, Ji Wu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

When is Your LLM Steerable?

arXiv:2606. 11599v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Activation steering offers a lightweight approach to control language models' behavior at inference time, but whether it succeeds or fails heavily depends on the prompt, concept, model, and steering configuration.

By Chenrui Fan, Yize Cheng, Ming Li, Soheil Feizi, Tianyi Zhou
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 15

Towards Steering without Sacrifice: Principled Training of Steering Vectors for Prompt-only Interventions

arXiv:2605. 05983v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recently, steering vectors (SVs) have emerged as an effective and lightweight approach to steer behaviors of large language models (LLMs), among which fine-tuned SVs are more effective than optimization-free ones.

By Yuntai Bao, Qinfeng Li, Xinyan Yu, Ge Su, Wenqi Zhang, Liu Yan, Haiqin Weng, Jianwei Yin, Xuhong Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 5

OLMo-Detect: A Multi-Stage, Confounder-Controlled Benchmark for Membership Inference on Large Language Models

OLMo-Detect is a new benchmark for membership inference attacks (MIAs) on large language models, covering pre‑training, mid‑training, and post‑training stages. It aligns member and non‑member samples on key axes and rigorously filters non‑members using infini‑gram, also offering a shifted variant to test distribution robustness. Evaluation of 15 unsupervised and 3 supervised MIAs on the OLMo 2 family shows limited overall performance (best AUC 0.68), peak detection at mid‑training driven by data type, and sensitivity to distribution shifts, with findings generalizing to OLMo 3 and other models.

By Tao Shi, Chaoyi Xiang, Qiongkai Xu, Jey Han Lau