arXiv:2509. 24696v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Personalizing large language models (LLMs) to individual user preferences is a critical step beyond generating generically helpful responses.
By Zikun Qu, Min Zhang, Mingze Kong, Xiang Li, Zhiwei Shang, Zhiyong Wang, Yikun Ban, Shuang Qiu, Yao Shu, Zhongxiang Dai
arXiv:2605. 00696v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study adaptive querying for learning user-dependent quantities of interest, such as responses to held-out items and psychometric indicators, within tight query budgets.
By Kaizheng Wang, Yuhang Wu, Assaf Zeevi
arXiv:2609.36488v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong performance on complex web navigation tasks, yet they remain brittle in real-world settings...
By Dongchan Shin, Xing Han L\`u, Jiaqi Deng, Jay Gala, Tom\'as Vergara Browne, Jaewon Moon, Fengyuan Liu, Alexandre Drouin, Siva Reddy, Alexandre Lacoste
arXiv:2606. 00846v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Users increasingly face the challenge of selecting an appropriate LLM for a given task from a rapidly growing pool of LLMs, each with distinct but often opaque latent properties.
By Son Nguyen, Xinyuan Liu, Ransalu Senanayake
arXiv:2605.12894v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in settings where they interact with diverse users, including those who are uncle...
By Harshita Chopra, Kshitish Ghate, Aylin Caliskan, Tadayoshi Kohno, Chirag Shah, Natasha Jaques
arXiv:2602. 12394v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Personalized prompting offers large opportunities for deploying large language models (LLMs) to diverse users, yet existing prompt optimization methods primarily focus on task-level optimization while largely overlooking user-specific preferences and latent constraints of individual users.
By Yuchen Ma, Yue Huang, Wenjie Wang, Xiaonan Luo, Xiangliang Zhang, Stefan Feuerriegel
arXiv:2606. 08410v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personalized decision-making in multi-objective bandits requires learning user-specific trade-offs among competing objectives.
By Linfeng Cao, Ming Shi, Ness B. Shroff
arXiv:2604. 05379v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The sequential recommendation (SR) task aims to predict the next item based on users' historical interaction sequences.
By Xing Tang, Ziqiang Cui, Jingyang Bin, Xiaokun Zhang, Fuyuan Lyu, Jingyan Jiang, Dugang Liu, Chen Ma, Xiuqiang He
arXiv:2606. 06178v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) present a trade-off between performance and cost, where more powerful models incur greater expense.
By Jiahao Zeng, Ming Tang, Ningning Ding
arXiv:2609.37800v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Many recommender services repeatedly encounter cold-start cohorts, where new users arrive with little or no interaction history. This creates two cha...
By Serafima Lebedeva, Sumantrak Mukherjee, Ali Arshad Sadal, Ilias Ek\c{s}i, Rahul Sharma, Julia Mueller, Theresa Dombrowski, Jakob Karolus, Viktor Bengs, Eyke H\"ullermeier, Sebastian Vollmer
The paper introduces a method for creating query‑specific rubrics for DeepResearch‑style long‑form report generation by training rubric generators with reinforcement learning. It builds a dataset of queries annotated with human preferences, then uses a hybrid reward that includes preference consistency, format validity, and LLM‑based rubric evaluation. The learned rubrics outperform generic or manually constructed alternatives in distinguishing preferred reports and, when used as rewards, improve performance of both single‑agent and multi‑agent DeepResearch systems.
By Changze Lv, Jie Zhou, Wentao Zhao, Jingwen Xu, Shihan Dou, Zisu Huang, Muzhao Tian, Xiaohua Wang, Zhengkang Guo, Yang Liu, Pluto Zhou, Tao Gui, Le Tian, Xiao Zhou, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang, Jie Zhou
The paper introduces a simulation framework that uses large language model (LLM) agents conditioned on data‑driven personas to predict A/B test outcomes. These personas are built from anonymized user behavioral patterns, engagement signals, and inferred demographics, offering a more realistic population model than synthetic or rule‑based personas. The authors evaluate question design, persona data source, behavioral depth versus diversity, and population subsampling, achieving 0.75–0.90 directional accuracy on 40 real A/B tests.
By Ziyad Benomar, Weronika {\L}ajewska, Leonardo Perelli, Saab Mansour