arXiv Machine Learning

Synthetic Interaction Data for Scalable Personalization in Large Language Models

arXiv:2602. 12394v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Personalized prompting offers large opportunities for deploying large language models (LLMs) to diverse users, yet existing prompt optimization methods primarily focus on task-level optimization while largely overlooking user-specific preferences and latent constraints of individual users.

arXiv AI
Sep 24

COPE: Continual Personalization of LLMs under Sparse User Feedback via User Embeddings and Self-Evaluation

COPE (Continual Optimization with Personalized embedding and self-Evaluation) is a new framework that continually personalizes large language models using learnable user embeddings and self‑evaluation to generate proxy rewards. It integrates preference capture, self‑evaluation calibration, and personalized response optimization into a single update step, allowing continuous model updates even when explicit user feedback is sparse. Experiments demonstrate that COPE outperforms both training‑free and training‑based baselines, remains complementary to Retrieval‑Augmented Prompting, and shows reliable self‑evaluation, meaningful preference patterns, stable general capabilities, and robustness to shifting preferences and alternative evaluators.

By Ruike Cao, Fugen Yao, Liang Dong, Jian Xu, Guanjun Jiang, Li Xiao
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Learning Dynamic User Personas from Implicit Interaction Streams via Iterative Refinement

arXiv:2607. 26473v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalizing large language models (LLMs) to individual users is essential for improving user experience, yet existing approaches typically rely on explicit preference supervision such as pairwise comparisons or demographic attributes, limiting their applicability in natural interaction settings.

By Haifeng Wu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 29

Learning Dynamic User Personas from Implicit Interaction Streams via Iterative Refinement

Personalizing large language models (LLMs) to individual users is essential for improving user experience, yet existing approaches typically rely on explicit preference supervision such as pairwise comparisons or demographic attributes, limiting their applicability in natural interaction settings. We propose IRIS, a framework that learns dynamic user personas directly from implicit interaction streams by extracting behavioral signals from everyday conversations and iteratively refining persona representations through a prediction-driven closed loop without requiring explicit feedback.

arXiv AI
Aug 7

LUNAR: Benchmarking Personalized Large Language Models on UNiversal User BehAvioR Logs

arXiv:2608. 05246v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing personalized LLM benchmarks primarily rely on textual personas or isolated behavioral signals, providing limited evaluation of cross-domain behavioral personalization, where responses must be grounded in heterogeneous daily-life activities.

By Jiahao Zhang, Yongzhi Tong, Zelin Fu, Pengde Zhao, Yanmei Jiang, Jiang Feng, Min Yang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 15

Optimizing Sparse Outcomes Through Dense Behavioral Signals via Value-Guided Preference Distillation

arXiv:2609.14648v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning multi-turn dialogue agents is usually framed as matching turn-level human preferences, yet direct optimization of long-term outcomes is often...

By Ziyi Zhu, Daniel R. Cahn, Thomas D. Hull, Caitlin A. Stamatis, Olivier Tieleman, Guilherme B. Freire, Jinghong Chen
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Modeling and Optimizing User Preferences in AI Copilots: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomy

The paper surveys how AI copilots—AI-powered assistants for knowledge workers and developers—can personalize their behavior by optimizing user preferences. It reviews how preference signals are collected, modeled at different interaction stages, and refined through feedback loops, and introduces a taxonomy of optimization techniques for pre-, mid-, and post-interaction phases. The study evaluates each technique’s strengths, limitations, and design implications, aiming to unify efforts across AI personalization, human‑AI interaction, and language model adaptation.

By Saleh Afzoon, Ali Shahsavandi, Phuong Thao Huynh, Melika Zare, Zahra Jahanandish, Amin Beheshti, Usman Naseem