arXiv:2606. 17459v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating the decision-making capabilities of large language models (LLMs) is a growing research priority, yet existing benchmarks focus on isolated cognitive tasks such as reasoning, knowledge retrieval, and economic rationality in stylized settings.
By Yuyang Dai, Xueqing Peng, Lingfei Qian, Zhuohan Xie
arXiv:2608. 08621v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Running a business is a challenging form of intelligent work.
By Yijun Pan, Yukun Lian, Kunyu Shi, Junbo Li, Hongwei Xue, Sicong Xie, Guannan Zhang, Xiaoying Xing
arXiv:2607. 26220v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Context: Large Language Models (LLMs) offer natural-language flexibility for automated requirements elicitation but frequently generate structurally invalid requirements and logical inconsistencies, lacking formal correctness guarantees.
By Ahmed Ibrahim
Context: Large Language Models (LLMs) offer natural-language flexibility for automated requirements elicitation but frequently generate structurally invalid requirements and logical inconsistencies, lacking formal correctness guarantees. Objectives: This study aims to eliminate logical inconsistencies and enforce structural conformance in LLM-generated requirements while quantifying the LLM's pre-validation decision uncertainty within a formal domain model.
arXiv:2603. 14805v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Enterprise software organizations accumulate critical institutional knowledge - architectural decisions, deployment procedures, compliance policies, incident playbooks - yet this knowledge remains trapped in formats designed for human interpretation.
By Gal Bakal
arXiv:2606. 15575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Organizational knowledge is fragmented across a variety of software systems, tacit expertise, and manual documents that have traditionally been designed for human consumption.
By Anne S. R. Marx, Ricardo M. Avelino, Torbj{\o}rn Netland, Mennatallah El-Assady
arXiv:2608. 10153v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprises are deploying autonomous AI agents faster than they can govern them, and prevailing approaches stretch a single discipline, typically DevSecOps built for deterministic automation, across every scale of agency.
By Srinivas Telukunta, Georgios Nektarios Lilis, Lucio Baron
arXiv:2606. 16319v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern AI systems exhibit structural failures that capability scaling alone does not reliably fix: they optimize under-specified objectives with no architectural mechanism to question whether the objective should be optimized at all.
By Edward Y. Chang
arXiv:2607. 05638v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Teams deploying large language models in business contexts need evaluation systems, yet most treat evaluation as static model selection: run benchmarks, rank models, deploy the winner.
By Kenneth Benavides, Josh Fleischer, Danti Chen
arXiv:2604. 17220v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Modeling coordination among generative agents in complex multi-round decision-making presents a core challenge for AI and operations management.
By Jiuyun Jiang, Yuecheng Hong, Bo Yang, Jin Yang, Guangxin Jiang, Xiaomeng Guo, Guang Xiao
arXiv:2607. 23126v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI tools has created new literacy demands for designers who must verbalize tacit knowledge through natural language prompts.
By Daisaku Sato
arXiv:2606. 09039v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This study proposes the Behavioral Protocol Framework (BPF), an entropy-controlled pluralistic alignment framework designed to address two critical challenges in autonomous agent economies: the hivemind effect arising from excessive strategic convergence among agents and the lack of transparency in autonomous decision-making processes.
By Cheonsu Jeong