arXiv AI
Jul 28
Regulating for AI Legitimacy
arXiv:2607. 24391v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI systems already govern.
Retrofitters, pragmatists and activists: Public interest litigation for accountable automated decision-making
arXiv:2511. 03211v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper examines the role of public interest litigation in promoting accountability for AI and automated decision-making (ADM) in Australia.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Visible to the Court: How AI Is (and Isn't) Litigated in U.S. Federal Court Opinions
arXiv:2607. 23888v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In the United States, artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly deployed amid limited federal regulation.
arXiv AI
Aug 28
LAAF: A Layered Accountability Architecture Framework for LLM Applications
The paper introduces LAAF, a Layered Accountability Architecture Framework for Large Language Model (LLM) applications, developed through a systematic review of 122 primary studies and 12 regulatory documents. It identifies five accountability dimensions and four families of mechanisms—technical controls, human oversight, organisational governance, and documentation/traceability—evaluated across maturity levels. The framework maps onto major standards such as the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, and sectoral guidance, highlighting gaps in human oversight, accountability metrics, disciplinary alignment, and empirical validation.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 27
LAAF: A Layered Accountability Architecture Framework for LLM Applications
The paper presents LAAF, a Layered Accountability Architecture Framework for Large Language Model (LLM) applications, developed through a systematic review of 122 primary studies and 12 regulatory documents. It identifies five dimensions of accountability and four families of mechanisms—technical controls, human oversight, organisational governance, and documentation/traceability—each assessed for maturity. The framework is mapped onto major regulatory standards (EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001) and highlights persistent gaps such as under‑specified human oversight and lack of shared accountability metrics.
arXiv AI
Aug 13
Co-constructing sociotechnical AI governance: participatory system mapping using algorithm registers
arXiv:2608. 12166v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Algorithm registers have been championed as a means of providing transparency on the use of algorithms in public services.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
Agentic AI: User Empowerment or Foreclosure?
arXiv:2608. 06510v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Agentic AI promises systems that can act on users' behalf, from filtering content to negotiating prices to selecting services.
arXiv AI
Jun 12
The AI Legal Specialist: A Juridically Autonomous Professional Profile for AI Governance
arXiv:2606. 12415v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid global expansion of artificial intelligence regulation has generated, across multiple jurisdictions, a demand for legal expertise dedicated to AI that the market has addressed in a fragmented manner.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
A Regulatory Placebo? The Systemic Failure of Mandatory GenAI Labeling
arXiv:2608. 16470v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We examine the worldwide trend of mandatory labeling of generative artificial intelligence(GenAI) as a reactive, symbolic form of legislation triggered by technological panic and institutional responses.
arXiv AI
Aug 10
Agentic AI: User Empowerment or Enclosure?
arXiv:2608. 06510v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic AI promises a more flexible form of digital agency: systems that can act on users' behalf, from filtering content to negotiating prices to selecting services.
arXiv AI
Jul 1
AI Transparency: Governance Compliance or Stakeholder Requirements?
arXiv:2606. 30652v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Transparency is increasingly mandated for public-sector AI systems, with organisations required to publish statements describing their AI use and oversight arrangements.
arXiv AI
Jul 1
A Technical Typology of AI Systems in Public Administration
arXiv:2606. 31755v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector often treats "AI" as a single category, neglecting technical distinctions between different AI systems.
arXiv AI
Aug 6
Towards a New Grammar of Reasoning for Artificial Legal Intelligence and the Mecelle as Its Semantic Protocol
arXiv:2608. 04011v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This article examines the enduring epistemic and methodological crisis of traditional legal practice in light of the opportunities and constraints introduced by artificial intelligence.