Truth, Trust, and Trouble: Medical AI on the Edge
arXiv:2507. 02983v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) hold significant promise for transforming digital health by enabling automated medical question answering.
arXiv:2608. 14631v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As consumers increasingly turn to AI chatbots for skincare advice, the technical accuracy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in cosmetic chemistry remains largely under-evaluated.
arXiv:2507. 02983v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) hold significant promise for transforming digital health by enabling automated medical question answering.
arXiv:2607. 08423v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid integration of Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) into critical infrastructure promises to revolutionize personalized healthcare and dietary management.
arXiv:2608. 19875v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Patients often submit short, underspecified queries to healthcare chatbots that lack the patient-specific information needed to determine an appropriate response.
arXiv:2610.17183v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current chemistry benchmarks primarily evaluate outcome prediction or reaction pathway generation, but rarely test whether a model can explain why an o...
arXiv:2608. 10363v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents can accelerate nutrition research, but their analyses inherit the identity, semantic, and release ambiguities of the underlying data.
The paper introduces an LLM-as-a-Judge framework for evaluating the outputs of an agentic drug discovery assistant, ChatInvent, deployed at AstraZeneca. It defines four quality dimensions—Completeness, Relevancy, Structural Clarity, and Scope Adherence—alongside deterministic Tool Call Correctness checks, and validates the judge against five expert annotators. After optimizing the best-performing judge with few-shot demonstrations, alignment with human majority votes improves from 0.80 to 0.86, and the framework reveals that informal question phrasing does not degrade output quality.
arXiv:2601. 09853v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Real-world health questions from patients often unintentionally embed false assumptions or premises.
NodeSyn is a method that generates socially aligned synthetic data for evaluating AI models. It combines a fine‑tuned taxonomy generator with credible sources and sensitive attributes to produce queries that reflect real societal contexts and nuanced harms. In tests across ten LLMs in Medical Advice and Self‑Harm, NodeSyn outperformed generic synthetic baselines, raising failure rates significantly and revealing that failures stem from both topic selection and sociotechnical grounding.
arXiv:2608. 06931v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly involved in scientific discovery, yet it remains unclear whether they can support complex real laboratory science.
NodeSynth is a method that generates socially aligned synthetic data by combining a fine‑tuned taxonomy generator with credible sources and extracted sensitive attributes to produce queries that reflect real societal contexts and nuanced harms. In evaluations across ten open‑weight and proprietary large language models on Medical Advice and Self‑Harm tasks, NodeSynth outperformed generic synthetic baselines, structured synthetic benchmarks, and authentic human‑authored queries, inducing higher failure rates that highlight model vulnerabilities. Ablation and variance attribution studies show that the granular Level 3 taxonomic expansion and sociotechnical grounding of queries drive these failure rates, underscoring the importance of nuanced data for high‑stakes evaluation.
arXiv:2603. 23433v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: AI agents are becoming active decision-makers on the Internet.
Beauty assessments from Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly popular, prompting a study comparing 2,513 human ratings to four commercial AI models—Claude, Gemini, GPT, and Grok. The study found that MLLMs consistently rate faces more favorably and with a narrower range than humans, yet they maintain strong correlations with human judgments and accurately track the rank‑ordering of faces. While all models agree strongly with each other, Grok showed the lowest agreement with human ratings, and only face age emerged as a common predictor of attractiveness across humans and MLLMs.