arXiv Computer Vision

A Lightweight Multi-Metric No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Framework for UAV Imaging

The paper presents MM‑IQA, a lightweight no‑reference image quality assessment framework designed for UAV imaging. It fuses interpretable metrics—blur, edge structure, low‑resolution artifacts, exposure imbalance, noise, haze, and frequency content—to output a single quality score between 0 and 100. Evaluated on five benchmark datasets, MM‑IQA achieved SRCC values from 0.647 to 0.830 and runs in about 1.97 s per image with modest memory usage.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 29

LEIQ-Assessor: Multi-dimensional Quality Assessment of Low-light Enhanced Images via Multi-task Learning

Low-light image enhancement algorithms (LIEAs) aim to improve the visibility of images captured under poor illumination. However, the enhancement process often introduces artifacts such as noise amplification, color shift, structural damage, and over-exposure, which degrade the perceptual quality of the enhanced images.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

UAV Thermal Imagery for Inert Ordnance Screening: Multi Campaign Dataset Development,Object Detection, and Practical Recommendations

The paper presents a multi‑campaign UAV thermal image dataset for inert ordnance screening, comprising 5,855 labeled image pairs collected in Tennessee across diverse terrains and seasons. The authors trained YOLOV11l and RT‑DETR‑R50 models on 33 m and 15 m altitude data, achieving automated candidate detection, and provided practical guidelines for future humanitarian mine action surveys. The dataset and models aim to aid screening and prioritization for follow‑up technical surveys or EOD assessment, not to replace clearance operations.

By Chad Melton, PhD., Annabelle Kelton
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Raw Imagery Impacting Your AI: Should You Care?

The paper investigates how raw or minimally processed satellite imagery affects onboard AI object detection for space missions. By systematically degrading Very High Resolution Maxar images in terms of Signal‑to‑Noise Ratio, Modulation Transfer Function, and Ground Sampling Distance, the authors evaluate three lightweight detectors—YOLOv5s, YOLOX‑S, and NanoDet—on the resulting data. Results show that image quality impacts detection performance in a degradation‑specific way, with GSD consistently shifting performance, while MTF and SNR effects vary by model and resolution; severe blur‑plus‑noise combinations cause the greatest losses.

By Adrien Dorise, Marjorie Bellizzi, St\'ephane May
arXiv AI
Jul 8

From Global to Granular: Revealing IQA Model Performance via Correlation Surface

arXiv:2601. 21738v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evaluation of Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models has long been dominated by global correlation metrics, such as Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficient (PLCC) and Spearman Rank-Order Correlation Coefficient (SRCC).

By Baoliang Chen, Danni Huang, Hanwei Zhu, Lingyu Zhu, Wei Zhou, Shiqi Wang, Yuming Fang, Weisi Lin