Hankel Subspace Self‑Supervised Reconstruction (HSSRecon) is a scan‑specific framework for parallel MRI that partitions data by acquisition units before Hankel lifting and normalizes repeated Hankel copies. Instead of predicting missing k‑space directly, the network learns a compact complex‑valued Hankel subspace operator, and reconstruction is performed with a conjugate‑gradient solver enforcing hard data consistency. The method provides theoretical guarantees on uniqueness and error bounds, and demonstrates competitive performance on fastMRI brain data across multiple contrasts and sampling masks.
By Mingyu Hu, Siquan Zhu, Xijun Zhong, Qiegen Liu
BrainWideBench is a benchmark that evaluates across‑animal transfer on multi‑region neural recordings from 139 mice, covering 276 brain regions. It comprises three task suites—behavior decoding, neural activity prediction, and anatomical organization recovery—to test whether learned representations support diverse downstream objectives. The benchmark shows that while pretraining improves performance over single‑session baselines, current methods vary in transfer ability and none perform uniformly well across all suites, highlighting the challenge of developing general‑purpose neural representations.
By Alexandre Andre, Shivashriganesh P. Mahato, Vinam Arora, Keshav Balaji, Divyansha Lachi, Nanda H. Krishna, Jingyun Xiao, Yizi Zhang, Ximeng Mao, Wenrui Ma, Han Yu, International Brain Laboratory, Daniel Birman, Niccol\`o Bonacchi, Gaelle A. Chapuis, Joana A. Catarino, Felicia Davatolhagh, Mayo Faulkner, Laura Freitas-Silva, Fei Hu, Julia M. Huntenburg, Anup Khanal, In\^es Laranjeira, Petrina Lau, Guido T. Meijer, Nathaniel J. Miska, Jean-Paul Noel, Alejandro Pan-Vazquez, Georg Raiser, Cyrille Rossant, Karolina Z. Socha, Anne E. Urai, Miles J. Wells, Steven J. West, Olivier Winter, Blake Richards, Guillaume Lajoie, Cole Hurwitz, Mehdi Azabou, Matthew R. Whiteway, Liam Paninski, Eva L. Dyer
Hankel Subspace Self-Supervised Reconstruction (HSSRecon) is a scan‑specific framework for parallel MRI that partitions data by acquisition units before Hankel lifting and normalizes repeated Hankel copies. Instead of directly predicting missing k‑space data, the network learns a compact complex‑valued Hankel subspace operator, and reconstruction is performed with a conjugate‑gradient solver enforcing hard data consistency. The method is theoretically justified with proofs of positive definiteness, uniqueness, and error bounds, and demonstrates competitive performance on fastMRI brain data across multiple contrasts and sampling masks.
arXiv:2603. 19100v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) enables non-invasive monitoring of brain activity across clinical and neurotechnology applications, yet building foundation models for EEG remains challenging due to differing electrode topologies and computational scalability, as Transformer architectures incur quadratic sequence complexity.
By Dana\'e Broustail, Anna Tegon, Thorir Mar Ingolfsson, Yawei Li, Luca Benini
arXiv:2603. 04438v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Fully unsupervised deep generative modeling (FU-DGM) offers significant potential for compressively sampled magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MRI) reconstruction.
By Qingyong Zhu, Yumin Tan, Xiang Gu, Dong Liang
arXiv:2608. 02070v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been widely used in motor rehabilitation, disease diagnosis, and other neural engineering scenarios.
By Zhu Chen, Dingkun Liu, Yuheng Chen, Dongrui Wu
The paper introduces τ+C+Mag, a physics‑driven deep learning method that incorporates auxiliary k‑space magnitude information into accelerated steady‑state dynamic MRI reconstruction. By observing strong consistency of k‑space magnitudes across time‑frames, the authors develop an ADMM‑based unrolling framework with a magnitude‑aware data‑fidelity term, using quadratically smoothed optimization and momentum updates to handle non‑differentiability and non‑convexity. Experiments on retrospectively and prospectively undersampled cine and phase‑contrast flow MRI datasets show improved artifact suppression, sharper anatomical detail, and better phase preservation compared to conventional PD‑DL approaches, as confirmed by blinded expert readers.
By Mahdi Saberi, Ya\c{s}ar Utku Al\c{c}alar, Merve G\"{u}lle, Chetan Shenoy, Mehmet Ak\c{c}akaya
The paper introduces FLEX‑MRI, a method that accelerates MRI reconstruction by partitioning the recovery process into a few finite intervals defined by progressive k‑space support changes. Instead of learning fine‑grained local dynamics, FLEX‑MRI directly learns the reconstruction change across each interval and employs stochastic exploration during inference to sample alternative transition paths. Experiments on multi‑coil MRI datasets demonstrate that FLEX‑MRI outperforms competing methods while keeping computational efficiency comparable to few‑step baselines.
By Muhammad Usama Mirza, Esin \"Ozt\"urk I\c{s}{\i}k, Tolga \c{C}ukur
arXiv:2608. 02070v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been widely used in motor rehabilitation, disease diagnosis, and other neural engineering scenarios.
By Zhu Chen, Dingkun Liu, Yuheng Chen, Dongrui Wu
arXiv:2606. 03936v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operator surrogates (NO) approximate PDE solutions orders of magnitude faster than numerical solvers, but suffer from spectral bias: high-frequency content is systematically attenuated, limiting reliability where fine-scale structure matters.
By Niccol\`o Perrone, Fanny Lehmann, Stefania Fresca, Filippo Gatti
arXiv:2607. 06132v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-Pool Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MRI provides valuable metabolic information but is clinically limited by long acquisition times.
By Dexuan Li, Yupeng Wu, Chenglong Wang, Hanlin Liu, Hui Zhen, Jianqi Li, Guang Yang
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) super-resolution is vital for improving diagnostic accessibility, yet most methods treat it as a deterministic mapping from a fixed low-resolution input to a high-resolution target. This overlooks a key property of MRI acquisition physics: spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) are inherently coupled, making any given low-resolution scan merely one of many possible realizations under varying acquisition trade-offs.