The paper introduces Direct Relational Set‑Risk Pruning (DRSR), a method for compressing the history of long‑horizon language‑model agents by selecting deletion sets based on risk constraints rather than independent unit scores. DRSR builds counterfactual supervision offline, then uses a lightweight scorer to predict set‑level harm during deployment, removing the largest safe set while respecting recency, protocol, and budget limits. Experiments on WorkBuddyBench Full260 and Eval40 show that DRSR improves mean reward from 0.699 to 0.802 and reduces token usage by over 20%, with further analyses highlighting the importance of decision‑conditioned relations, retained context, pair interactions, and abstention.
Long-horizon language-model agents accumulate reasoning traces, tool exchanges, and observations whose relevance changes with the current decision. Existing compression strategies often score historic...
arXiv:2605. 07482v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine unlearning for large language models (LLMs) aims to selectively remove memorized content such as private data, copyrighted text, or hazardous knowledge, without costly full retraining.
arXiv:2608.29363v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise data agents answer business queries by chaining many tool calls over multiple reasoning steps, routinely accumulating hundreds of thousands...
arXiv:2606. 17168v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When LLM weights are open or fine-tuning is available through an API, suppressing hazardous knowledge and tendencies is not enough: removal has to be deep enough that an adversary cannot restore it.
This paper introduces a deletion interface for a pretrained language model, measuring how effectively deleted records are removed from the model’s memory. By retrofitting a support‑vector memory gate into the global attention layers of a frozen Gemma 3, the authors show that deletions can be performed without altering weights and that the resulting state is close to a reference state that never stored the record. Experiments on 4B‑parameter models demonstrate low perplexity impact and strong evidence that deleted content is hard to recover, while larger or smaller models fail to achieve the same guarantees.
arXiv:2608. 16370v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Task completion is the standard metric for evaluating context compression, yet it is incomplete: compression can increase an agent's interaction cost by forcing it to reacquire dropped state while leaving completion statistically unchanged.
arXiv:2606. 08151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-using LLM agents often fail not because relevant text is absent, but because decisive evidence is not selected, compressed, or surfaced at action time.
The paper introduces LRE (Learned Relevance Eviction), a lightweight, CPU‑only, language‑model‑free scorer that learns which parts of an agent’s interaction history are task‑critical and preserves them verbatim. In experiments, LRE matches or surpasses baseline eviction policies on accuracy‑cost trade‑offs, recovers 93% of full‑history accuracy, reduces worst‑case prompt size by 52%, and outperforms dense and token‑pruning encoders in conversational memory while being 295–1569× smaller. The method also achieves superior budgeted answer quality on LoCoMo reading and can be trained annotation‑free, recovering 95% of supervised scorer performance.
arXiv:2607. 21111v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents are trained on fixed behavioral trajectories, which makes trajectory-level deletion important when selected data must be removed after training.
The paper introduces State‑Conditioned Minimal Sufficient Evidence Recovery (SER), a method that, given a coding agent’s current state, reconstructs a compact set of evidence passages that collectively provide all facts needed for the agent’s next decision. Using the SERBench dataset of 500 held‑out states from 45 repositories, the authors show that their MSS‑Complement approach recovers a complete evidence set for 73.0 % of states with five items and 80.6 % with eight, outperforming baseline ranking methods. The study also demonstrates that this set‑level policy improves downstream performance on AMA‑Bench and highlights the importance of retrieving missing facts rather than merely re‑ranking similar passages.
arXiv:2609.30465v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-experts (MoE) models activate few experts per token but store the full expert pool. Expert pruning reduces this storage burden; at a fixed...
arXiv:2609.14976v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon LLM agents accumulate memory across sessions, creating sparse but high-impact risks: stale facts, conflicting updates, cross-user leakage,...