arXiv AI By Shuyu Liu

What Does Context Compression Cost an Agent? Interaction Costs Unrevealed by Task-Completion Metrics

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 16370v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Task completion is the standard metric for evaluating context compression, yet it is incomplete: compression can increase an agent's interaction cost by forcing it to reacquire dropped state while leaving completion statistically unchanged.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
6d ago

Compress What You See, Not What You Say: Anchored Context Distillation for Latent-Observation Software Engineering Agents

The paper introduces LOHA, a context layout that compresses older tool observations into soft tokens while keeping the agent’s own turns and the last K observations in plain text, and ACD, a training method that distills full‑text predictions into this latent representation while anchoring behavior on plain text. This approach reduces context per call by up to 57% without significant loss in resolve rates, and improves instance throughput in single‑GPU serving. Experiments on SWE‑bench Verified show that K=3 yields a 43–57% compression with only modest performance impact, while larger windows favor task performance over compression.

By Zhensheng Zou (Peking University), Guoqing Wang (Peking University), Dan Hao (Peking University)
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

DTOC: Dynamic Tool Output Compression for Adaptive Context Management in AI Agents

The paper introduces Dynamic Tool Output Compression (DTOC), a framework that manages context in large‑language‑model agents by storing full tool outputs in external memory and inserting compact placeholders into the active context. DTOC treats context updates as explicit, reversible operations within the agent’s reasoning loop, allowing selective reconstruction of compressed outputs when needed. Experiments on the DeepSWE benchmark show that for responsive models such as Sonnet 4.6 and GPT‑5.4, DTOC reduces input tokens and agent steps while significantly improving solve rates and lowering cost per solved task, with ablation studies confirming the importance of reversibility for maintaining performance.

By Abhay Chaturvedi, Shreya Bhattacharya, Rashmika Gopalkrishnan, Peter van der Putten