arXiv:2606. 01476v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-Policy Distillation (OPD) trains a student model on its own generative trajectories under dense token-level feedback from a stronger teacher, mitigating both the off-policy distribution shift of Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and the sparse credit assignment of Reinforcement Learning (RL).
Offline on-policy distillation gains efficiency by collecting student trajectories and teacher supervision once and reusing them throughout optimization. The same reuse makes imperfect supervision per...
On-policy distillation (OPD) aligns a student model with a teacher's logit distribution on student-generated trajectories. This approach has achieved strong empirical gains and can often surpass conve...
The paper introduces a method for offline on‑policy distillation that addresses the problem of imperfect teacher supervision. By training on teacher‑successful problems and measuring changes in token likelihoods on teacher‑failed trajectories, the authors derive a learnability signal that weights the distillation loss. This approach improves performance on mathematical reasoning and code generation tasks while reducing computational cost compared to online distillation.
arXiv:2608. 16333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) aligns a student model with a teacher's logit distribution on student-generated trajectories.
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a powerful recipe for improving language-model reasoning, but it is expensive to repeat on every new strong model because the target model must generate many rollouts during training. As models scale, post-training itself becomes a bottleneck.
The paper introduces DIAL-OPD, a token‑selection strategy for on‑policy distillation that weights reward magnitude by the logarithmic mean of teacher and student probabilities, controlled by a parameter β. Experiments on four teacher‑student pairs across seven mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that retaining only 40 % of tokens with DIAL‑OPD yields up to 5.25 % higher mean accuracy than vanilla OPD and doubles AIME25 Pass@16, outperforming even stronger full‑token baselines. The study demonstrates that careful supervision allocation can surpass gains from simply scaling teacher size.
The paper investigates on‑policy distillation (OPD), showing that teacher supervision during OPD contains significant noise that grows with teacher size, yet the student policy remains largely unaffected by this noise. It finds that OPD’s gains stem mainly from suppressing low‑log‑probability tokens, a process that can be replicated without a teacher. Building on this insight, the authors propose On‑Policy Self‑Adaptation (OPSA), a supervision‑free method that uses entropy‑adaptive negative advantages to improve performance on several benchmarks, outperforming both the base model and OPD.
The paper introduces Joint On-Policy Learning and Teaching (JOLT), a method that trains a single policy to act both as a privileged teacher and an unprivileged student. It derives a condition ensuring the teacher’s distillation update aligns positively with the student’s reward gradient, leading to a KL‑regularized teacher objective that matches the student’s current capabilities. Experiments show JOLT improves training efficiency and performance across various tasks, with additional gains when student rewards are incorporated.
arXiv:2605. 07804v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) leverages dense teacher rewards to enhance reasoning models.
The paper reports that in on‑policy distillation for large language models, reasoning performance can be improved by supervising only a tiny fraction of generated tokens—sometimes just one or two tokens per reasoning trajectory, about 0.05% of all tokens. This sparse supervision consistently matches or exceeds full‑token training across nine teacher‑student setups on mathematical reasoning, and is also validated on coding reasoning, Llama models, and PPO‑based reinforcement learning with verifiable reward. The findings suggest that effective post‑training does not require token‑intensive supervision and may align more closely with natural learning processes that focus on critical reasoning steps.
arXiv:2609.37170v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Off-policy and on-policy distillation have traditionally been formulated as separate paradigms, each favoring a different property of distillation tr...
arXiv:2608. 08176v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) improves the reasoning abilities of LLMs by internalizing privileged context into model parameters through self-distillation.