arXiv:2610.09660v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Automatic Short Answer Scoring (ASAS) requires models that can score student responses against question-specific criteria while remaining efficient and...
By Zhifan Sun, Sebastian Gombert, Fabian Zehner, Leon Camus, Longwei Cong, Hendrik Drachsler
arXiv:2606. 06546v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for education requires measuring how models teach, not only what they know.
By Tao Liu, Ye Lu, Ruohua Zhang, Siyu Song, Wentao Liu, Aimin Zhou, Hao Hao
arXiv:2608. 20281v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models often fail to answer questions about a bounded document collection when the source documents are not retrieved at inference time.
By Qian Kou, Xiaofeng Shi, Xiaosong Qiu, Hua Zhou
arXiv:2510.13935v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: The facts a language model stores are tied to its parameter count, so small models that fit on edge devices fail on expert problems, which ne...
By Kenan Alkiek, David Jurgens, Vinod Vydiswaran
arXiv:2509. 16780v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show promise as educational aids but often lack alignment with specific course materials.
By Eason Chen, Chuangji Li, Eric Li, Zimo Xiao, Jionghao Lin, Kenneth R. Koedinger
arXiv:2609.36982v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Knowledge concept tagging aims to assign specific concept or topic labels to educational content, which is essential for both educators and learners...
By Zhiwei Yang, Jiahua Yang, Huiru Lin, Xing Chen, Quanlong Guan
LuxIT is a monolingual instruction‑tuning dataset for Luxembourgish, created by synthesizing instruction‑answer pairs from native texts using the DeepSeek‑R1‑0528 model and a quality‑assurance LLM‑as‑judge process. The resulting 227,507 high‑quality pairs were used to fine‑tune 14 LLMs (≤15 B parameters), yielding an average accuracy increase of +5.37 percentage points on standardized Luxembourgish proficiency exams and improvements in macro‑averaged F1 on nine of the fourteen downstream NLP tasks. These findings demonstrate that synthetic monolingual data can effectively enhance LLM performance in low‑resource languages and reveal the complex relationship between exam performance and practical NLP gains.
By Julian Valline, Cedric Lothritz, Siwen Guo, Jordi Cabot
arXiv:2608. 06933v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Today, we improve models by training and evaluating them on problems at the frontier of their abilities.
By Sarah Pratt, Jae Sung Park, Scott Geng, Ali Farhadi
arXiv:2608. 15535v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present L3Cube-IndicQuest v2, a large-scale gold-standard multilingual question-answering benchmark for evaluating the India-specific factual knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs).
By Rinit Jain, Tirthraj Mahajan, Advait Joshi, Raviraj Joshi
Large language models are increasingly used to assist with statistical and data science tasks, but current evaluations assume the analysis goal is already defined. This paper formalizes the upstream step of Statistical Problem Formulation into two subtasks—classification of the statistical problem and identification of relevant variables—and introduces StatFormBench, a benchmark comprising 1,013 samples from five statistics textbooks and a data science case library. Across 14 open- and closed‑source LLMs, the best zero‑shot models achieve only 72.0% fine‑grained classification accuracy and 63.2% variable set overlap, with no model consistently excelling in both subtasks and limited gains from enhanced prompting strategies.
By Chen Wang, Junzhe Zhao, Xin Cong, Wanlu Deng, Ke Deng
arXiv:2609.24650v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Readability assessment is essential for tailoring texts to intended audiences across educational, healthcare, and information retrieval domains. Howeve...
By Rapha\"el Thieffry, Matej Martinc
The paper introduces Jev, a specialized decision model that selects among given options rather than generating text, and benchmarks it against 19 large language models (LLMs) across 13 multiple-choice tasks in knowledge, reasoning, and multilingual domains. Jev performs competitively with frontier LLMs on knowledge and commonsense benchmarks, achieving the top score on MMLU-Redux and ARC-Challenge, and surpasses most representative and all small LLMs except in mathematical word problems where it lags behind. The study demonstrates that a specialized decision model can match general-purpose LLMs on knowledge-based decisions but struggles with multi-step calculations.
By Xing Li, Qingcheng Chang, Jinzhong Ning, Changfeng Xu, Shenlong Zhang, Yijia Zhang, Ling Luo, Hongfei Lin