arXiv:2606. 09135v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We demonstrate that widely deployed Large Language Model (LLM) inference stacks harbor a steganographic channel that requires no modification to model weights, sampling code, or output distributions.
By Felix M\"achtle, Jonas Sander, Sebastian Berndt, Ben Weimar, Nils Loose, Thomas Eisenbarth
arXiv:2601. 22818v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Fine-tuned LLMs can covertly encode prompt secrets into outputs via steganographic channels.
By Charles Westphal, Keivan Navaie, Fernando E. Rosas
arXiv:2606. 09411v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models can be fine-tuned to encode prompt-borne secrets into fluent, seemingly benign outputs.
By Charles Westphal, Timothy Douglas, Keivan Navaie, Tiago Pimentel, Fernando E. Rosas
The paper introduces CARTS, a steganographic method that uses autoregressive language models to encode a payload text into a stegotext of identical token length by preserving per‑position rank information across contexts. It provides a formal security analysis, proving exact correctness under deterministic model assumptions, and defines key security notions such as context search, key collisions, message equivocation, and non‑commutativity of encoding maps. Empirical tests on Llama 3 8B confirm perfect payload recovery, no random key collisions, and no commuting key pairs, indicating resistance to the studied attack vectors.
By Wissam Ghantous, Alexander V. Mantzaris
arXiv:2606. 28425v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Increasingly autonomous agentic AI systems pose novel multi-agent risks, such as secret collusion via covert communication channels.
By Jimmy Laurence Rippin, Simon C. Marshall, David Demitri Africa, Christian Schroeder de Witt
arXiv:2608.23375v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Gumbel-based inference verification bounds LLM weight exfiltration by only forgiving token choices that plausibly arise from honest GPU nondeterminis...
By Nikita Kezins
This survey reviews 148 linguistic steganographic methods, 60 countermeasures, 23 evaluation metrics, and 9 open challenges, providing taxonomies, reviews, and adoption analyses. It identifies five paradigm shifts brought by large language models: moving from covertext modification to prompt-only generation, from heuristic to provable security, from white-box symmetric models to black-box or asymmetric access, from security-centric designs to joint optimization, and from text-quality concerns to engineering issues. The paper aims to serve as a reference and roadmap for practical and responsible linguistic steganography in the LLM era.
By Ruiyi Yan, Chenhui Chu, Zhongliang Yang, Yugo Murawaki
The paper introduces LeakGauge, a method that appends a suffix to a model’s input to gauge the risk of context leakage before decoding. By mapping prefill token probabilities to an attack‑risk score, LeakGauge achieves high AUROC (0.944–0.996) across 11 large language models, including GLM‑5.2 and Kimi‑K3, and remains robust to language changes and different attack styles. The approach also demonstrates sensitivity to internal leakage directions and can be implemented with fewer than 0.5K additional parameters and minimal latency.
By Maosen Zhang, Jianshuo Dong, Boting Lu, Wenyue Li, Xiaoping Zhang, Tianwei Zhang, Jie Zhang, Han Qiu
arXiv:2608. 02698v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-using agents built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed not by a single operator but by many, side by side on shared infrastructure.
By Mohamed Chahine Ghanem
arXiv:2606. 08403v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text-centered prompt-injection defenses assume that the malicious signal is visible in one of the inspected text views.
By Mudit Sinha, Sanika Chavan
arXiv:2606. 04141v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents often place sensitive credentials in the same context window as untrusted retrieved content, creating a direct path for indirect prompt injection to induce credential exfiltration.
By Kargi Chauhan, Pratibha Revankar
Repeat-After-Me is a black-box adaptive visual prompt injection technique that can reveal personally identifiable information or trigger malicious tool calls in both open-weight and commercial vision‑language models, achieving attack success rates above 80% on Qwen3.6‑27B and 47% on GPT‑5.5. The method works even when the benign user prompt is unrelated to the injected task and does not explicitly authorize it, and it retains significant effectiveness when transferred across models or optimized on surrogate systems. In a real‑world OpenClaw Discord deployment, a minimally injected image can overwrite TOOLS.md, enabling remote code execution and secret exfiltration.
By Sizhe Chen, Yu-Lin Tsai, Ivan Evtimov, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Raluca Ada Popa, David Wagner, Arman Zharmagambetov