arXiv:2609.08286v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Multi-scale modeling has become an effective approach for long-term time series forecasting, capturing temporal patterns that range from fine-grained l...
By Namwoo Kim, Hyungryul Baik, Yoonjin Yoon
arXiv:2610.15760v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Multiscale structure is central to time series forecasting: temporal signals contain slowly varying trends, intermediate seasonal patterns, and high-...
By Sarang Rajendra Patil, Vishal Fenn, Mengjia Xu
arXiv:2608. 08675v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-term time series forecasting benefits from preserving global structure such as trends and seasonality.
By Xuan-May Le, Minh-Tuan Tran, Ling Luo, Uwe Aickelin, Dinh Phung, Trung Le
The paper introduces a graph deep learning framework that learns to forecast spatiotemporal data across multiple hierarchical structures, using variations among hierarchies as multi‑task regularization. By jointly training on different aggregation levels, the model reduces over‑specialization and improves forecasting accuracy. A novel top‑down operator ensures coherent forecasts with linear time and space complexity, making the approach computationally efficient.
By Valentina Moretti, Cesare Alippi, Andrea Cini
arXiv:2606. 28553v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In many real-world applications, such as retail sales, energy usage, and supply chain planning, forecasting is performed across hierarchical structures.
By Ruchi Pakhle
LagNet introduces LagLayer, a Toeplitz‑structured operator that ties history‑to‑future connections by relative lag, replacing traditional temporal linear layers in forecasting models. By stacking LagLayers with activations and multiple feature maps, LagNet achieves competitive performance on long‑term time series benchmarks. Sensitivity matrix diagnostics and limited‑data experiments show that LagLayer offers a sample‑efficient alternative to linear layers.
By Zhenan Yu, Guangxin Jiang, Jiuyun Jiang, Jin Yang
arXiv:2603. 02220v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Time series forecasting remains a challenging problem due to the intricate entanglement of intra-period fluctuations and inter-period trends.
By Yixin Wang, Yifan Hu, Peiyuan Liu, Naiqi Li, Tao Dai, Shu-Tao Xia
arXiv:2607. 01918v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present Zeus, a unified tuning-free Time Series Foundation Model (TSFM) that delivers superior performance across diverse analysis tasks without any task-specific fine-tuning.
By Yisong Fu, Zezhi Shao, Chengqing Yu, Yujie Li, Yongjun Xu, Xueqi Cheng, Fei Wang
arXiv:2508. 02753v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Time Series Forecasting (TSF) faces persistent challenges in modeling intricate temporal dependencies across different scales.
By Haonan Yang, Jianchao Tang, Zhuo Li, Long Lan
The paper introduces Horizon-Resolved eXplanation (HRX), a framework that adds a horizon axis to time‑series forecasting explanations, allowing each forecast step to have its own importance map. HRX operates as a plug‑in for any differentiable forecaster, includes an evaluation protocol that tests the impact of removing top‑ranked inputs, and a rank criterion to decide when horizon resolution is beneficial. Experiments across multiple backbones and datasets demonstrate that incorporating the horizon axis improves explanation quality and that the step‑wise dependence is low‑dimensional, requiring only a few shared maps regardless of forecast length.
By Seunghan Lee, Jun Seo, Jaehoon Lee, Junhyeok Kang, Sangjun Han, Sungdong Yoo, Minjae Kim, Tae Yoon Lim, Dongwan Kang, Hwanil Choi, Soonyoung Lee, Wonbin Ahn
arXiv:2609.36119v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Spatial-temporal (ST) forecasting underpins many real-world systems such as traffic, climate, and energy networks. While existing methods implicitly as...
By Zhenyu Lei, Chenghao Liu, Yushun Dong, Qi R. Wang, Jundong Li
NVExplain is a model‑agnostic framework that explains time‑series forecasting by attributing each forecast horizon to temporally relevant historical lags. It models forecasting as a latent trajectory, introduces semantic flow to track information evolution, and aggregates this into a lag‑horizon attribution matrix. The method also generates structure‑preserving perturbations and fits sparse local surrogates to produce human‑readable, temporally coherent explanations, and demonstrates competitive faithfulness and stability across benchmark datasets.
By Muyan Anna Li, Manikandan Ravikiran, Aditi Gautam