arXiv:2607. 12893v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-term memory has become a foundational capability for LLM-based agents that accompany users across extended, multi-session interactions.
arXiv:2608.21755v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon agents need memory that identifies relevant experience, resolves revisions, and exposes checkable provenance. We present ECHO (Embodied Co...
The paper introduces QEMem, a framework that rethinks how large language model agents use long‑term memory by constructing query‑specific evidence sets rather than relying on individual memory relevance. QEMem combines query‑guided discovery, source‑grounded reification into structured ViewCards, and sufficiency‑guided refinement to assemble comprehensive evidence from multiple memory granularities. Experiments show that QEMem achieves 91.43% LLM‑judge accuracy on LoCoMo with Claude Opus 4.5, surpassing leading baselines by significant margins and improving evidence coverage for cross‑session queries.
The paper introduces MERIT, a benchmark that evaluates the marginal benefit of long‑term memory for tool‑using large language model agents while explicitly accounting for cost. MERIT provides episodic tool‑use tasks across three domains, verifies dependence on earlier‑episode facts, and measures memory operations in tokens and dollars. Experiments on GPT‑4.1‑mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Claude Sonnet 5 show that memory can significantly improve task success, but its utility varies widely across models and memory implementations, and full replay is rarely cost‑effective.
The paper introduces a scale‑conditioned evaluation protocol for agent memory that measures how usable evidence degrades as irrelevant sessions accumulate. It logs memory trajectories and reports four diagnostics—budget‑compliant reliability, tail memory‑call burden, failure‑regime decomposition, and the usable‑scale boundary. Experiments on LongMemEval and LoCoMo show that reliability loss varies across memory interfaces and agents, highlighting that scalable‑memory claims must be conditioned on agent, interface, scale range, and interaction budget.
The paper critiques current agent memory benchmarks that rely on downstream QA accuracy, arguing they conflate memory correctness with retrieval and generation quality, leading to misleading results. It introduces FEB-30, a new benchmark of 30 fact‑evolution trajectories across six diagnostic categories and three difficulty levels, generated automatically to provide deterministic ground truth. Using FEB-30, the authors show a significant divergence between intrinsic and extrinsic evaluations, revealing that a representative memory system correctly classifies memory operations only 20% of the time—an error invisible to traditional QA metrics.
The paper introduces D$^2$ACCI, a dual-loop diagnostic protocol designed to improve evidence-preserving memory in large language model agents. It provides a structured framework that uses paired evidence, protected-slice monitoring, and trace-level localizability to decide whether to promote, flag, or reject memory interventions. The authors also present DCR, a metric for measuring failure localizability, and D$^2$ACCI‑Eval, a reusable artifact for gate replay, demonstrating significant performance gains on three public benchmarks and highlighting the importance of traceable, statistically grounded diagnostics.
arXiv:2507. 05257v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents primarily focus on evaluating reasoning, planning, and execution capabilities, while another critical component-memory, encompassing how agents memorize, update, and retrieve long-term information-is under-evaluated due to the lack of benchmarks.
DyadMem introduces a new benchmark for evaluating how long‑term agents remember user‑specific relational information, called User‑conditioned Relational Agent Memory (URAM). The dataset contains 3,065 episodes, 50,961 sessions, and 61,210 QA pairs, with detailed annotations for memory capture, update, and recall across multi‑session trajectories. Experiments on 20 models show strong performance in a gold‑memory setting but a significant drop in full‑pipeline QA, highlighting gaps in current LLM memory capabilities.
arXiv:2604.27695v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Long-term conversational memory requires retrieving evidence scattered across multiple sessions, yet single-pass retrieval fails on temporal...
The paper investigates how memory systems can answer a current query correctly yet fail to retain distinctions needed for later updates. Using a paired‑history audit, the authors evaluate 24 history pairs across six synthetic mechanisms and two model backends, achieving perfect reveal accuracy on DeepSeek and high accuracy on GLM. Record‑level audits reveal specific failures in structured reveal memories and frontier late‑reference adequacy, and the authors test a label‑equivariant repair that only partially restores correctness.
arXiv:2606. 17328v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly maintain long-term memory of user facts across sessions.