The paper evaluates the impact of adding a persistent memory tier to a multi‑agent large language model inference system. While decomposing long‑context inference across agents reduces the peak KV cache usage from about 35 MiB to 14.3 MiB per query, the persistent tier adds only a modest 0.368 MiB to the cache and shows no measurable accuracy improvement across eight dataset pairs. The authors argue that the lack of benefit is structural, as single‑question benchmarks do not provide informative recall opportunities, and they outline conditions and detection procedures for agent‑memory ablations.
By Hochan Son, Kyungdoe Han, Jaehan Koh, Xiaowu Dai, Wenlu Xu, Guang Cheng
The paper introduces MERIT, a benchmark that evaluates the marginal benefit of long‑term memory for tool‑using large language model agents while explicitly accounting for cost. MERIT provides episodic tool‑use tasks across three domains, verifies dependence on earlier‑episode facts, and measures memory operations in tokens and dollars. Experiments on GPT‑4.1‑mini, Claude Haiku 4.5, and Claude Sonnet 5 show that memory can significantly improve task success, but its utility varies widely across models and memory implementations, and full replay is rarely cost‑effective.
By Shweta Mishra, Shashank Mishra
DyadMem introduces a new benchmark for evaluating how long‑term agents remember user‑specific relational information, called User‑conditioned Relational Agent Memory (URAM). The dataset contains 3,065 episodes, 50,961 sessions, and 61,210 QA pairs, with detailed annotations for memory capture, update, and recall across multi‑session trajectories. Experiments on 20 models show strong performance in a gold‑memory setting but a significant drop in full‑pipeline QA, highlighting gaps in current LLM memory capabilities.
By Yifei Tao, Xinyu Zhong, Henry Hengyuan Zhao, Fanyi Wang, Tengda Guo, Wentao Qiu, Ying Wang, Liujian Tang
arXiv:2608. 13883v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most agent-memory benchmarks test post-hoc recall, whereas MemoryArena evaluates whether memory supports interdependent, multi-session task completion.
By Chaoqun Zhan, Qiang Zhou, Guannan Li, Zhenqiang Huang, Qianjin Wang
The paper introduces LSREP, a Longitudinal State‑Replay Evaluation Protocol designed to assess how conversational memory evolves over time, incorporating ordered replay, lifecycle schedules, repeated probes, evolving reference answers, and mechanism‑fidelity checks. It applies LSREP to ICE v2, a local‑first memory middleware, and reports that on three ordinary‑density datasets ICE v2 achieves near‑zero mean quality difference from vector‑RAG while using fewer fragments but slightly more prompt tokens, yet fails catastrophically on a dense dataset. In a public diagnostic, ICE v2 underperforms pure vector‑RAG on LongMemEval, revealing significant multi‑session and temporal failures and a quality‑cost trade‑off rather than superior efficiency.
By Deepesh Sonar
arXiv:2609.16073v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) serves as the primary memory architecture for long-horizon autonomous agents. However, treating shared memory as...
By Hamed HaddadPajouh, Amir AmiriTabat
arXiv:2609.22231v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-horizon interactions with LLM-based assistants require memory systems that preserve and update user states, preferences, and interaction histories...
By Zeyu Liu, Jian Zhong, Rongduo Han, Ziyang Wu, Shunye Tang, Chenghao He, Yaxuan Yang, Yihang Qiu, Ailing Wang, Xiao Liang, Guohuan Xie, Xiaokang Xue, Gongchen Li, Haining Zhang, Wei Wang
arXiv:2607. 13157v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent memory is a systems problem for long-horizon agents.
By Richmond Alake, Cesare Bernardis, Paul Cayet, Luca Engel, Damien Hilloulin, Sungpack Hong, Allen Hosler, Nickolas Kavantzas, Ingo Kossyk, Son Le, Rhicheek Patra, Kartik Talamadupula, Valentin Venzin
The paper investigates how persistent memory in AI agents can lead to over‑trust in stale facts, creating a "Memory Trust Gap" that worsens as model capability increases. Using a benchmark with Benefit and Safety suites across Qwen3 models of varying sizes, the authors show that larger models are more prone to harmful over‑trust, especially when metadata is absent or misleading. They also demonstrate that mitigation strategies such as exposing metadata or pre‑resolving conflicts improve accuracy, but the effectiveness depends on model size and dataset.
By Jundong Hu, Shekar Ramachandran
arXiv:2607. 08032v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models, and the agents built on them, spend an ever-growing share of their compute and memory on remembering: caching attention keys and values, carrying long prompts, maintaining recurrent state, and storing what happened in previous turns and sessions.
By Ashwin Gerard Colaco, Nada Lahjouji
arXiv:2609. 04875v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-running LLM agents are stateful: beyond the transcript they accrete compressed summaries, plaintext memory, pending tool plans, and, under every serving API, a KV cache.
By Chao Yao, Yangbo Wei, Zhen Huang, Junhong Qian, Chenle Chen, Shaoqiang Lu, Chen Wu, Lei He
arXiv:2610.18052v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Long-term memory has become a core component of large language model (LLM) agents. As agents accumulate personal information over long-term use, users...
By Bofan Xie, Chaokun Wang, Guanchen Ge, Songyao Wang, Fang Niu, Hang Zhang, Wei Wang